On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:47 PM, rose.parks@att.net wrote:
Thank you, Andre. The message I posted was purposely written with the intention of saying nothing either positive or negative. And, the main reason for that is that I am not familiar with the site and have formed no opinions about it. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Andre Engels" andreengels@gmail.com
2006/7/10, Paweł Dembowski fallout@lexx.eu.org:
If you have not visited the site yet, be prepared for Google Ads, POV entries, and - oh yes - an occassional Wikipedian. Apologies if this is old news...
So? It's not a Wikimedia project, but a private wiki. Not every wiki has to be NPOV and without ads (and wikia is a commercial wiki provider, so they're bound to have ads).
So? So nothing. Ruth is just warning people who expect to get to some kind of Wikipedia as to what to actually expect.
If I go to google.com, I do not expect the wikipedia. If I go to wiki.org I do not expect the wikipedia. If I go to twiki.org I do not expect the wikipedia. If I go to emacswiki.org I do not expect the wikipedia. If I go to pbwiki.com I do not expect the wikipedia. If I go to wiki.x.org I do not expect the wikipedia. If I go to wikia.com I do not expect the wikipedia.
Wiki != wikipedia. (NOT(!) equal to (=) wikipedia, for those who don't know this code syntax)
I have no idea why andre thinks he knows "what to actually expect" from yet another wiki idea... Looks like after viewing the 708 million hits on google for 'wiki', he has concluded that 1,500 wikis out of 708,000,000 hits determine the future of wikipedia.
Perhaps I should ask for stock tips?
-Bop -- 4245 NE Alberta Ct. Portland, OR 97218 503-282-1370