--- Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
I think a little patience is called for here. Just start over and call for new designs.
Fred
I disagree with this notion that the voting process was "ruined' or that "starting over" will accomplish something. The arguments against the current logo fall into only two camps-- its terrible ( a meaningless, subjective complaint ).. And "its too cluttered" ( which can be fixed at [[m:final logo variants]].)
I agree that next time will be better, but I dislike the 20/20 hindsight of people who say it was wrong from the start. Where were you two months ago, with your better ideas? The only thing *wrong* with the process now-- is the perception that the ratification of the logo (as it exists now ) is an urgent one-- as if we want the logo to be ready for the press release, which absolutely must be ready when the ticker (arbitrarily set: sizeX="article") ticks at 300K.
Dont rush the cooks while their cooking, unless you want the chef's surprise. ~S~
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com