--- Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
I think a little patience is called for here. Just
start over and call for
new designs.
Fred
I disagree with this notion that the voting process
was "ruined' or that "starting over" will accomplish
something.
The arguments against the current logo fall into only
two camps-- its terrible ( a meaningless, subjective
complaint ).. And "its too cluttered" ( which can be
fixed at [[m:final logo variants]].)
I agree that next time will be better, but I dislike
the 20/20 hindsight of people who say it was wrong
from the start. Where were you two months ago, with
your better ideas?
The only thing *wrong* with the process now-- is the
perception that the ratification of the logo (as it
exists now ) is an urgent one-- as if we want the logo
to be ready for the press release, which absolutely
must be ready when the ticker (arbitrarily set:
sizeX="article") ticks at 300K.
Dont rush the cooks while their cooking, unless you
want the chef's surprise.
~S~
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com