OK. Agreed.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:01 AM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Yeah and how do we know that is true? I think
there's no need to rush now,
the project is already active for a long time now and will stay so if it
takes some days more.
It's not that I don't believe Rachitrali would be a suitable expert himself,
but when there's one expert, another one will be somewhere who can at least
confirm him, right? And I see Satdeep notes he already contacted one.
Am 12.02.2017 9:54 vorm. schrieb "Milos Rancic" <millosh(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:52 AM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
Ehm no, why should there not be?
The project creator is one of the most important cultural figures of
that language. It seems to me redundant to check if the language is
legitimate in such circumstances.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom