On 6 Feb 2017, at 21:45, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am in favor of making LangCom a normal democratic
body: 50%+1 (of
those who voted) for regular decisions, 2/3 majority (of those who
voted) for changing the rules. ("Of those who voted" because we have u
number of inactive members.)
I would support this.
Also, unlike a decade ago, LangCom has expert
legitimacy and integrity
now, as well as a decade of experience. That's the reason why I don't
think that any group would use majority as a tool to push unreasonable
decisions.
I agree,
Michael