Hello, [[m:Logo]] claims logo should be consistent. I agree. This document shows us the "scrabble" type logo as Wiktionary logo; at least it was a result of straw poll. I am not sure if the Wiktionary active editors love it. Perhaps not. On the Wikimedia Foundation website, on "Our projects" table and [[Wikimedia:Our projects]], both pages show visitors the old one (dic entry type) logo as project logo. On the project itself, most of projects - I visited top 10 websites of Wiktionaries to write this mail - most of projects use the older one as their logos, except one. The Vietnamese Wiktionary uses the scrabble type. We need to pursue consistency here? Or is it okay for all parties involved? I think it is a matter of promotion/publification, not only the community, so sent a cc to Communication committee (before I failed to type the current email address of this list) . Two different logos: "scrabble type" http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiktprintable_without_text.svg "dic entry type" http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiktionary.png -- KIZU Naoko Wikiquote: http://wikiquote.org * habent enim emolumentum in labore suo * _______________________________________________ Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l

Salut, This page states that " Logos are global: All languages have to use the same logo ". The old one and the new one both are not consistent : every language has it's own version of the logo. And as Gerard said, there is a dilemna...

Has anyone bothered to check whether the Scrabble people have any IP issues with using that logo? Ec