Hello,
[[m:Logo]] claims logo should be consistent. I agree.
This document shows us the "scrabble" type logo as Wiktionary logo; at
least it was a result of straw poll. I am not sure if the Wiktionary
active editors love it. Perhaps not.
On the Wikimedia Foundation website, on "Our projects" table and
[[Wikimedia:Our projects]], both pages show visitors the old one (dic
entry type) logo as project logo.
On the project itself, most of projects - I visited top 10 websites of
Wiktionaries to write this mail - most of projects use the older one
as their logos, except one. The Vietnamese Wiktionary uses the
scrabble type.
We need to pursue consistency here? Or is it okay for all parties involved?
I think it is a matter of promotion/publification, not only the
community, so sent a cc to Communication committee (before I failed to
type the current email address of this list) .
Two different logos:
"scrabble type"
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiktprintable_without_text.svg
"dic entry type"
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiktionary.png
--
KIZU Naoko
Wikiquote:
http://wikiquote.org
* habent enim emolumentum in labore suo *
