[Muke Tever (Re: [Wiktionary-l] change of templates) writes:]
Jim Breen Jim.Breen@infotech.monash.edu.au wrote:
Exactly why should templates, codes, etc. be chosen to avoid overlapping with ISO 639 codes?
Many of the Wiktionaries that are not en.wiktionary.org use ISO 639 codes to name the templates that call language names and categories.
I made the mistake of overlooking this referred to template names; not to field values.
Would it not be possible to qualify a template name by its usage, e.g. "pos_adj" or "lang_adj"?
Jim
Jim Breen wrote:
[Muke Tever (Re: [Wiktionary-l] change of templates) writes:]
Jim Breen Jim.Breen@infotech.monash.edu.au wrote:
Exactly why should templates, codes, etc. be chosen to avoid overlapping with ISO 639 codes?
Many of the Wiktionaries that are not en.wiktionary.org use ISO 639 codes to name the templates that call language names and categories.
I made the mistake of overlooking this referred to template names; not to field values.
Would it not be possible to qualify a template name by its usage, e.g. "pos_adj" or "lang_adj"?
Jim
Hoi, That could be done but it is not consistent with the way this template was used until now. The proposed change is remedial in nature. Thanks, GerardM
wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org