Yann Forget <yann(a)forget-me.net> wrote:
I don't understand why there are important
differences for the numbers of
articles for some Wiktionaries with the manual count (from
Special:Statistics) at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wikistats/wiktionary/EN/TablesArticlesTotal.htm :
* 323 vs. 209 for Esperanto (eo)
* 301 vs. 83 for Serbian (sr)
Maybe the stats counter does not count an article whose links are all in
templates as having a link in the article itself?
Or maybe it's just that it's using a slightly outdated version of the
database -- it's dated March 9.
There are also curious figures for database size
http://en.wikipedia.org/wikistats/wiktionary/EN/TablesDatabaseSize.htm
3.4 M for Esperanto (eo) for 323/209 articles
Several large index pages, such as
http://eo.wiktionary.org/wiki/Vortaro_Germana-Esperanta_d
32 M for Interlingua (ia) for 253 articles
Interlingua has a lot of index pages, also.
1.1 M for Slovak (sk) for 21 articles
That *is* odd.
http://sk.wiktionary.org/wiki/Špeciálne:Longpages
lists a lot of 10 and 20K pages, and the article for "Wiki" is
purportedly almost 70K long.
Apparently it was a target for Chinese spam:
http://sk.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&oldid=1725
14 M for Basque (eu) for 60 articles
eu: also has similar indices to ia:, and seems to have been chosen as the
new host for the Romanica material.
*Muke!
--
website:
http://frath.net/
LiveJournal:
http://kohath.livejournal.com/
deviantArt:
http://kohath.deviantart.com/
FrathWiki, a conlang and conculture wiki:
http://wiki.frath.net/