--- cookfire cookfire@softhome.net wrote: > Muke Tever wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:07:02 +0100, Timwi
timwi@gmx.net wrote:
I don't remember it being a consensus at all. I seem to recall some being quite opposed to it.
Really? Can you provide links? I only remember people emphasising that they don't mind because they think the current work-around work perfectly for them. I seriously don't see how anyone can seriously be opposed to having a dictionary with correct spellings. :/
I disagreed,
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wiktionary-l/2004-May/000018.html
Polyglot said it could be done but he would vote
against it also:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wiktionary-l/2004-May/000020.html
I initially opposed the idea since we had come up with a workaround. After some more thought and reading the opinion of others on Wiktionary EN, I changed my mind and now I'm convinced proper capitalisation is indeed crucial for a dictionary project.
I'm also convinced proper capitalisation is crucial for a dictionary project. But I'm not convinced Timwi's solution is the best way to go about it.
Hippietrail.
I came up with the workaround after asking a developer whether it would be possible to have proper capitalisation. The answer back then was that it wouldn't be possible, so we learned how to live and cope with it. Now that there is a willingness to change it, I think it is a blessing.
Polyglot _______________________________________________ Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com