--- Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net> wrote: > Andrew Dunbar
wrote:
>> I seriously don't see how anyone can seriously
>> be opposed to having a dictionary with correct
>> spellings. :/
>
> Now this statement is pure rhetoric. I'm in favour
> of correct spellings and I'm sure everybody is.
But
there's
more than one way to solve a problem and
I'd like everybody to think this through and
consider all possible ways to fix it before
jumping in and making major changes.
You seem to be thinking of this as a much more
"major change" than it really is. Again, this is
only about removing an arbitrary technological
restriction.
Again, spell out the restriction instead of using this
fuzzy language.
Sure changing an "Uppercase first letter" option is
minor from the point of view of implementing it.
And splitting many many pages which are currently
together is a major change. Some of the repurcussions
are also major.
I'ts not "only" about flipping this switch, it's
about all the long-term side-effect as well.
> 2. Case fold nothing. (Timwi)
> Heh, I'll focus on this one if you don't mind ;-)
That's what this one is. We currently case-fold the
first letter. This is a major side effect of making it
uppercase.
Against 2:
* People are going to add duplicates thinking
their
word is not in the dictionary.
Are you thinking of people adding an article on,
say, [[malayalam]] when
the correct spelling [[Malayalam]] exists?
Yes. And adding the german for "Kind" on the page for
"Kind" because they don't realize it's already on the
"Kind" page. Remember there are going to be hundreds
or thousands of pages which will look like this after
the simple switch is flicked, and people will continue
to copy it.
Again, this is irrelevant to the discussion, it has
nothing to do with the question at hand.
It has everything to do with it. People currently do
type in words without regard to the first letter,
sometimes carelessly, sometimes seeing that that's how
Wikis currently work.
People can *already* create pages at wrong spellings
([[Malaialam]], say).
Surely you can't be suggesting that these are the same
problem. You don't have to be a bad speller to
overlook
the change in handling the case of the first letter.
Yes, the switch would increase the potential, but
adding redirects in the right places reduces it
again, and so this is not an argument against.
Wiktionary doesn't work as well with redirects as
Wikipedia. You can't put a redirect on "kind" to
"Kind"
because "kind" is also a word. This is a very common
situation on Wiktionary.
* Quite a
large number of entries will have to be
changed back to uppercase after the script is
run.
Have you read my original mail? Assuming your
beloved current workaround
The more you use this POV language, the closer I get
to becoming annoyed. Do you mean your original mail in
this current discussion or in the old discussion which
you feel already settled everything?
I have read what others have written. If they have the
wrong impression as well as me, you probably haven't
been clear enough.
Can you provide a link to the mailing list archive or
simply repeat the relevant part in this thread please?
actually works, *no* pages will need to be
"changed
back". Some might still need to be moved to
lower-case, but only very few. You don't have
to participate in this clean-up process if you don't
want to.
If your script is dependent on my "beloved"
workaround,
then perhaps you are assuming that the workaround has
been implemented on all pages, which it certainly has
not.
* Words which
differ only by case of any letter
must
be on separate pages. (proper nouns vs. common
nouns
vs. abbrevations & acronyms)
This is one major thing where you're going wrong.
Why "must" they? They
don't.
Because they have different case. This is exactly what
your change means.
Unless you mean that we could continue to put "bill"
and "Bill" on the same page. Obviously we could but
it would be absurd to put "Bill" on a page other
than the one titled "Bill" on a system which supported
it.
Or are you going to suggest putting redirects on all
these pages?
Because the
name of the article is currently
always
uppercase, all the headings generated by the Wiki
software are in uppercase - which is very
unprofessional for a dictionary.
Bingo.
So we agree on at least some of the symptoms, but not
on the cure. Or at least not on how hastily a cure
should be administered...
I've read
some peoples' opinions that they would
prefer one entry per page but this is never going
to
work because of homographs anyway.
One could always have article titles like [[kind
(English)]] vs. [[kind
(Dutch)]]. This makes linking extremely cumbersome,
though.
Exactly. Hopefully this would never happen.
Hippietrail.
Timwi
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger -
sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com