Thanks for clarifying this and helping to improve the Wiki page.
We will look into the Swedish pattern. It occurred to me, that we might
use the framework not only to extract facts, but also deploy it to find
errors (not only when lexical data is missing, but directly extract
information where the sole purpose is to provide debugging messages).
Sebastian
On 05/25/2012 04:20 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
On 2012-05-24 18:33, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
I firmly believe that it would be a set back to a
lot of people, if
we started to divide the communities again.
I don't want to divide the community. The problem I see is people look at
DBpedia's RDF output, then come to this list (where DBpedia's page
directs
them) and complain that Wiktionary looks strange, because they think the
RDF output is Wiktionary. I added an introductory paragraph that
hopefully
will reduce this risk.
The Wiktionary community is far smaller and more specialized than the
Wikipedia community, and by presenting statistics and arguments, you
should be able to influence how Wiktionary works, to facilitate your RDF
extraction. For example, if you find some Swedish language templates
deviate from a common pattern, just say so, and they can be fixed.
--
Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Projects: