Thanks for clarifying this and helping to improve the Wiki page. We will look into the Swedish pattern. It occurred to me, that we might use the framework not only to extract facts, but also deploy it to find errors (not only when lexical data is missing, but directly extract information where the sole purpose is to provide debugging messages).
Sebastian
On 05/25/2012 04:20 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
On 2012-05-24 18:33, Sebastian Hellmann wrote:
I firmly believe that it would be a set back to a lot of people, if we started to divide the communities again.
I don't want to divide the community. The problem I see is people look at DBpedia's RDF output, then come to this list (where DBpedia's page directs them) and complain that Wiktionary looks strange, because they think the RDF output is Wiktionary. I added an introductory paragraph that hopefully will reduce this risk.
The Wiktionary community is far smaller and more specialized than the Wikipedia community, and by presenting statistics and arguments, you should be able to influence how Wiktionary works, to facilitate your RDF extraction. For example, if you find some Swedish language templates deviate from a common pattern, just say so, and they can be fixed.