Erik wrote:
The Condorcet vote is of no relevance whatsoever.
I agree. I've already voted once on this issue and will not vote again via another method. Everyone who is voting via the Condorcet method is wasting their time.
--mav
From: "Daniel Mayer"
Erik wrote:
The Condorcet vote is of no relevance whatsoever.
I agree. I've already voted once on this issue and will not vote again via another method. Everyone who is voting via the Condorcet method is wasting their time.
Personnaly I think Condorcet method is the more fair method for wide vote, but I agree to choose voting system we want for second round using FPTP (I fact, imho, "Approval voting" may be better here : vote for all method we agree).
Aoineko
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . till we *) . . .
Hi Guillaume,
From: "Daniel Mayer"
Erik wrote:
The Condorcet vote is of no relevance whatsoever.
I agree. I've already voted once on this issue and will not vote again via another method. Everyone who is voting via the Condorcet method is wasting their time.
If you look at the history of the page, mav, than you'll see that a alternative condorcet voting was available almost at the same time then the fptp voting ...
Personnaly I think Condorcet method is the more fair method for wide vote, but I agree to choose voting system we want for second round using FPTP (I fact, imho, "Approval voting" may be better here : vote for all method we agree).
I tried to do this, but was edited out.
__ . / / / / ... Till Westermayer - till we *) . . . mailto:till@tillwe.de . www.westermayer.de/till/ . icq 320393072 . Habsburgerstr. 82 . 79104 Freiburg . 0761 55697152 . 0160 96619179 . . . . .
Till-
I agree. I've already voted once on this issue and will not vote again via another method. Everyone who is voting via the Condorcet method is wasting their time.
If you look at the history of the page, mav, than you'll see that a alternative condorcet voting was available almost at the same time then the fptp voting ...
Shortly afterwards, yes. And how silly is it to end up with two vote results and to possibly have to vote again just to find out which one to accept?
Personnaly I think Condorcet method is the more fair method for wide vote, but I agree to choose voting system we want for second round using FPTP (I fact, imho, "Approval voting" may be better here : vote for all method we agree).
I tried to do this, but was edited out.
And how silly is it to let some people vote in their preferred voting method even when it is clearly indicated that they should use another one?
Regards,
Erik
Guillaume Blanchard wrote:
Personnaly I think Condorcet method is the more fair method for wide vote, but I agree to choose voting system we want for second round using FPTP (I fact, imho, "Approval voting" may be better here : vote for all method we agree).
That would have been the obvious thing; I believe that Erik even likes approval voting. *shrug*
-- Toby
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org