Stephen Gilbert wrote:
I only redirect common misspellings. In this case, I would redirect "Colombus" and ignore "Idendity".
[[Colombus]] is arguably a variant spelling, not a misspelling. But [[Idendity]] certainly shouldn't redirect to [[Identity]], since [[Identity]] doesn't even exist!!!
-- Toby
On Saturday 20 July 2002 21:34, Toby Bartels wrote:
Stephen Gilbert wrote:
I only redirect common misspellings. In this case, I would redirect "Colombus" and ignore "Idendity".
[[Colombus]] is arguably a variant spelling, not a misspelling. But [[Idendity]] certainly shouldn't redirect to [[Identity]], since [[Identity]] doesn't even exist!!!
"Colombus" could just as easily be a typo for "Colobus". I think we shouldn't be making disambigs for typos, so the page should be deleted.
phma
--- Pierre Abbat phma@webjockey.net wrote:
On Saturday 20 July 2002 21:34, Toby Bartels wrote:
Stephen Gilbert wrote:
I only redirect common misspellings. In this
case, I
would redirect "Colombus" and ignore "Idendity".
[[Colombus]] is arguably a variant spelling, not a
misspelling.
But [[Idendity]] certainly shouldn't redirect to
[[Identity]],
since [[Identity]] doesn't even exist!!!
"Colombus" could just as easily be a typo for "Colobus". I think we shouldn't be making disambigs for typos, so the page should be deleted.
I agree, disambigs for typos would be a bad idea. Redirects for common misspellings have proven useful, however. If a person typed "colombus" but meant to type "colobus", they would end up at the wrong page with or without a redirect.
-- Stephen G.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
Stephen Gilbert wrote:
--- Pierre Abbat phma@webjockey.net wrote:
On Saturday 20 July 2002 21:34, Toby Bartels wrote:
Stephen Gilbert wrote:
I only redirect common misspellings. In this
case, I
would redirect "Colombus" and ignore "Idendity".
[[Colombus]] is arguably a variant spelling, not a
misspelling.
But [[Idendity]] certainly shouldn't redirect to
[[Identity]],
since [[Identity]] doesn't even exist!!!
"Colombus" could just as easily be a typo for "Colobus". I think we shouldn't be making disambigs for typos, so the page should be deleted.
I agree, disambigs for typos would be a bad idea. Redirects for common misspellings have proven useful, however. If a person typed "colombus" but meant to type "colobus", they would end up at the wrong page with or without a redirect.
The way I look at it is this - I am a reasonably good speller, but I am dyslexic and there are some very common mistakes that I make often - confusing 'a's and 'e's in words, ommitting or adding double letters where they dont' belong... and if I realise that I have misguidedly tried to link to one of these words then I make it into a redirect because it's not a rare mistake. On the other hand, there's not much point in redirecting more than half of the misspellings or it'll get too confusing. Someone once suggested a special type of redirect ''misspelling of'' that would differentiate between alternative names for something (like Alexandre Dumas and Alexander Dumas) and misspellings (margarine and margerine - one of my most-confused words...).
At 03:58 PM 7/21/02 +1000, Karen aka Kajikit wrote:
I agree, disambigs for typos would be a bad idea. Redirects for common misspellings have proven useful, however. If a person typed "colombus" but meant to type "colobus", they would end up at the wrong page with or without a redirect.
The way I look at it is this - I am a reasonably good speller, but I am dyslexic and there are some very common mistakes that I make often - confusing 'a's and 'e's in words, ommitting or adding double letters where they dont' belong... and if I realise that I have misguidedly tried to link to one of these words then I make it into a redirect because it's not a rare mistake. On the other hand, there's not much point in redirecting more than half of the misspellings or it'll get too confusing. Someone once suggested a special type of redirect ''misspelling of'' that would differentiate between alternative names for something (like Alexandre Dumas and Alexander Dumas) and misspellings (margarine and margerine - one of my most-confused words...).
The problem here is figuring out what the common misspellings and typos are, and which can be misspellings for two or more equally reasonable encyclopedia entries. (My first typing of this sentence read "fro two or more"--we don't want to redirect real words because they can also be typos.) It's not safe to assume that my typos or common errors are globally common: I always get "weird" right, but for years typed "frined" more often than "friend." I don't think either of these is true in general.
Suggestion: before setting up a misspelling redirect, people should (a) google or otherwise check to make sure that the misspelling of their desired word A isn't a real word B that we're likely to want an entry on, and (b) check to make sure that the target of the redirect exists.
Pierre Abbat wrote:
"Colombus" could just as easily be a typo for "Colobus". I think we shouldn't be making disambigs for typos, so the page should be deleted.
This example illustrates that redirecting typos can easily become monkey business.
Trying to second guess somebody else's errors means jumping to often erroneous conclusions. I've already complained about somebody redirecting "pogram" to "program". Who's to say that the searcher wasn't looking for "pogrom"? To me "pogrom" is a far more likely subject for an encyclopaedia article than such a broadly generic term as "program".
Eclecticology
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org