Of course, by this rationale, Wikimedia Commons itself is an unnecessary fork, since all the images in the Commons could be put into Wikipedia itself.
Tsk tsk, being English-centric. Don't you realize that the Italian wikipedia can't refer to an English WP image directly, but has to upload each one to it:WP specifically? We have thousands of cloned images by now. The Commons is actually an anti-fork that will make all the images accessible to all WPs equally.
As the same could be said of Wikispecies (right now we have redundant species information in every language Wikipedia), this is precisely my point.
Hello, I've begun an Anglo-Saxon wiktionary, but there are a lot of words (I've only done æ so far, and that's over 200 words). Is there anyone who can either rearrange the pages into columns, or split it up like the English wiktionary or show me how to do so?
Thanks,
James
James R. Johnson wrote:
Hello, I've begun an Anglo-Saxon wiktionary, but there are a lot of words (I've only done æ so far, and that's over 200 words). Is there anyone who can either rearrange the pages into columns, or split it up like the English wiktionary or show me how to do so?
Thanks,
James
Hi James,
Would you mind not replying to messages and then changing the subject the line, thinking you are starting a new thread? On many newsreaders your new message appears as a reply to the old thread which can be confusing.
Thanks!
Pete
Would you mind not replying to messages and then changing the subject the line, thinking you are starting a new thread? On many newsreaders your new message appears as a reply to the old thread which can be confusing.
Or, if you know how, delete the In-Reply-To header. This is the line which makes that threading magic work.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org