Stan Shebs wrote:
But if you make small good edits in a separate Nupedia, they won't find their way back to Wikipedia, which might or might not be desirable...
Read mav's lips: No new no fork!
Er, no new fork!
If Nupedia participants edit the contents of an article, the edits take place on Wikipedia. Copyediting, corrections, re-wording all take place on Wikipedia.
I think the only editing that Nupedia should do separately from Wikipedia is XML markup.
Stephen Gilbert ------- Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia http://www.wikipedia.org
sgilbert@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
Stan Shebs wrote:
But if you make small good edits in a separate Nupedia, they won't find their way back to Wikipedia, which might or might not be desirable...
Read mav's lips: No new no fork!
Er, no new fork!
If Nupedia participants edit the contents of an article, the edits take place on Wikipedia. Copyediting, corrections, re-wording all take place on Wikipedia.
My point must not have been clear enough. Simply put, past experience with large open-source projects says that some forking and remerging is inevitable. Insist that it won't be necessary all you like, and maybe it won't be, but I piped up because I saw an incorrect impression of today's open-source projects being put forth as a process model.
Stan
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org