I've been working on creating diagrams for the playing arenas of various sports (for instance see http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_rules_football), using sodipodi (an SVG editor) and then exporting to PNG.
It seems to me that it would be useful for the purposes of future editing if people had access to my SVG files. At the moment, if people want to change the diagram they either have to ask me to make the changes, mail me for a copy of the SVG, or try the hack of modifying the exported bitmap on the site.
Obviously, I could upload the SVG source, but is this appropriate (we don't do this for any other type of file because of the bandwidth and storage issues) but where would be an appropriate place to put it?
So, basically, I'm raising the topic of whether and how we should handle "source files" for media we place in the Wikipedia.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:18:33PM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
I've been working on creating diagrams for the playing arenas of various sports (for instance see http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_rules_football), using sodipodi (an SVG editor) and then exporting to PNG.
It seems to me that it would be useful for the purposes of future editing if people had access to my SVG files. At the moment, if people want to change the diagram they either have to ask me to make the changes, mail me for a copy of the SVG, or try the hack of modifying the exported bitmap on the site.
Obviously, I could upload the SVG source, but is this appropriate (we don't do this for any other type of file because of the bandwidth and storage issues) but where would be an appropriate place to put it?
So, basically, I'm raising the topic of whether and how we should handle "source files" for media we place in the Wikipedia.
Actually, I upload "source files" to wikipedia and link them from the generated PNG's. I think this matches the WikiWay best and is best in the spirit of the GFDL.
Bandwidth usage will not be very high. Not many people will download the source. Storage might become an issue, but SVGs can be stored gzipped and are not very big when compressed.
And of course, sometimes in the future, we will support SVG natively without having to convert to PNG first. Would be a pity not to have your files at hands, wouldn't it?
Regards,
JeLuF
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:52:32PM +0200, Jens Frank wrote:
And of course, sometimes in the future, we will support SVG natively without having to convert to PNG first. Would be a pity not to have your files at hands, wouldn't it?
We must do this if we want to have decent print quality, so someone some day will implement that. But don't hold your breath.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org