Till Westermayer till at tillwe.de Tue Sep 2 08:55:13 UTC 2003
* Previous message: [Wikipedia-l] Gaps in 1.0 * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . till we *) . . .
Hi Anthere,
there is no logo 138?!
Till
Hi Tillwe
How observant of you :-) (<- this is meant to be a very friendly and cheerful irony)
Logo 138 (or rather logoS 138) were added after the deadline, hence were removed by our foreman (err...the organizer in case this word hold meanings I am not aware of).
One of the logo 138 had the same name than another, hence it replaced it. The previous saved state was restored.
Logos 138 were kat-related logo. Very nice artwork, but I fear they would not have been fit as logos anyway, so it is sad for the author, but won't impact the final choice.
Cheers Tillwe
I take the opportunity to report - as an ambassador - the displeasure of some author, who feel there is applied pressure to direct their creativity to another direction than is their wish, and officially ask me to help him as my english ability is better than his. (<- this is a neutral report)
In my opinion, any logo proposition and any logo versioning is a "free-of-choice" work, and "free-to-display" work (except for sex-race-color-political-religion related works perhaps, though this might be controversial), and any pressure on authors is out of bounds. Please. Thanks. (<- This is a personal opinion. Please and thanks mean please and thanks, and this part of my message is not for you Tillwe dear :-))
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Hi,
134 to 137 were put on the voting sheet after the deadline, too, I believe. This not being a problem seemed like a good example of WikiLove, in my eyes. See [http://meta.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=International_logos_(126-150)&a...] for example of voting in place without them.
Bye, Till we *)
-- Original Nachricht -- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 05:07:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthere anthere6@yahoo.com To: wikipedia-l@Wikipedia.org Cc: Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Re:logo pb Reply-To: wikipedia-l@Wikipedia.org
Till Westermayer till at tillwe.de Tue Sep 2 08:55:13 UTC 2003
- Previous message: [Wikipedia-l] Gaps in 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [
subject ] [ author ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . till we *) . . .
Hi Anthere,
there is no logo 138?!
Till
Hi Tillwe
How observant of you :-) (<- this is meant to be a very friendly and cheerful irony)
Logo 138 (or rather logoS 138) were added after the deadline, hence were removed by our foreman (err...the organizer in case this word hold meanings I am not aware of).
One of the logo 138 had the same name than another, hence it replaced it. The previous saved state was restored.
Logos 138 were kat-related logo. Very nice artwork, but I fear they would not have been fit as logos anyway, so it is sad for the author, but won't impact the final choice.
Cheers Tillwe
I take the opportunity to report - as an ambassador - the displeasure of some author, who feel there is applied pressure to direct their creativity to another direction than is their wish, and officially ask me to help him as my english ability is better than his. (<- this is a neutral report)
In my opinion, any logo proposition and any logo versioning is a "free-of-choice" work, and "free-to-display" work (except for sex-race-color-political-religion related works perhaps, though this might be controversial), and any pressure on authors is out of bounds. Please. Thanks. (<- This is a personal opinion. Please and thanks mean please and thanks, and this part of my message is not for you Tillwe dear :-))
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
________________________________________ Mehr Power für Ihre eMail - mit den neuen Leistungspaketen bei http://www.epost.de
At 05:07 AM 9/2/03 -0700, Anthere wrote:
Till Westermayer till at tillwe.de
How observant of you :-) (<- this is meant to be a very friendly and cheerful irony)
Logo 138 (or rather logoS 138) were added after the deadline, hence were removed by our foreman (err...the organizer in case this word hold meanings I am not aware of).
One of the logo 138 had the same name than another, hence it replaced it. The previous saved state was restored.
Logos 138 were kat-related logo. Very nice artwork, but I fear they would not have been fit as logos anyway, so it is sad for the author, but won't impact the final choice.
Cheers Tillwe
I take the opportunity to report - as an ambassador - the displeasure of some author, who feel there is applied pressure to direct their creativity to another direction than is their wish, and officially ask me to help him as my english ability is better than his. (<- this is a neutral report)
In my opinion, any logo proposition and any logo versioning is a "free-of-choice" work, and "free-to-display" work (except for sex-race-color-political-religion related works perhaps, though this might be controversial), and any pressure on authors is out of bounds. Please. Thanks. (<- This is a personal opinion. Please and thanks mean please and thanks, and this part of my message is not for you Tillwe dear :-))
My understanding is that artists are/were welcome to submit any logo they wanted, and then everyone--including artists--are encouraged to vote for logos we think are appropriate.
I'm not sure I understand the complaint.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org