Guillaume-

...

I agree and I think we need more time to well

organize this second round.

Not really. We have more than a week until we start.

I don't think a week is enough to clear all discussion and evaluate all solutions, but let's try.

...

Rules for the second round are already decided (in

details, not only vote

...

system) ?

For the most part, yes. I don't think there will be

any major changes. I

have just set the deadline for the method to Sep 12

so there will be three

days of time to translate the voting instructions.

I only see a "logo vote system" vote. Who decide the other points?

Even if we have to use Average method (not my favorite method) for that, I think we must create pages to vote on:

* Rules for submission

* Deadlines (too short imho)

* Logo vote method (pending...)

* Cheat handling

For submission I think we have better to have one main page with only the author favorite logo (1 logo) plus a link to one page per logo with all variants.

...

Do we vote for a concept or for a final logo ?

You vote for a final logo. There may be a need to

make a transparent

version or a larger one, but no significant changes

to the winning logo

will be made without clear consensus.

If we vote for a final logo we need a lot of variant, isn't it?

We can like a logo concept but prefer a different color, font text, contrast, frame style, etc.

For example, I see a lot of interesting logos variants in the Paullus page (made by him?) and I think it may be great if we can vote for all those variants (and new ones).

Imho, encourage wikipedians to propose new logos variants, is a better way to get the logo witch satisfy the most people. Sure, finalists' authors must select themselves witch logos are in accord with there own concept.

...

In other term do we have for each variant of a logo or just for a concept ?

You vote on each variant.

This must avoid FPTP method that disfavor logo with the more variants.

...

What is the solutions to reduce vote cheating ?

You need a user page on Meta that points to an

account with at least 10

legitimate edits.

Who will check each user to see if (s)he done at least 10 edits ? What about people who contribute anonymously ?

I forgot an important question :

- Why are you so hurried with deadlines !?

Aoineko

-------

Rulezzzzzzz Aoi ;-)

Merci sinc�rement.

Anthere

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com