Arbitration Committee Policy? - Wikipedia-l - lists.wikimedia.org

List overview All Threads
Download

Arbitration Committee Policy?

Re: [Wikipedia-l] New License was...

Help needed to develop fundraising...

Александр Сигачёв

6 Nov 2006 6 Nov '06

9:59 p.m.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_Committee Is this policy for all Wikipedias or only for English one? I think, where is an English project bias here, example in "Requests" section (not all local committes have so many members as English Arbitration). -- Alexander Sigachov

Reply

Show replies by thread

Ray Saintonge

6 Nov 6 Nov

10:37 p.m.

????????? ??????? wrote:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_Committee Is this policy for all Wikipedias or only for English one? I think, where is an English project bias here, example in "Requests" section (not all local committes have so many members as English Arbitration).

I agree. I think that all that can validly be given here is a list of the existing arbitration committees, and how to contact them. While there may be a need for an arbitration committee for meta, the en:wp committee should not be viewed as automatically having authority on meta. Ec

Reply

David Gerard

11:10 p.m.

On 06/11/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:

While there may be a need for an arbitration committee for meta, the en:wp committee should not be viewed as automatically having authority on meta.

Well, no. The AC on en:wp is for en:wp. I thought the dispute resolution procedure on meta was more the stewards going "hell no" from time to time. - d.

Reply

Anthere

11:40 p.m.

David Gerard wrote:

On 06/11/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:

While there may be a need for an arbitration committee for meta, the en:wp committee should not be viewed as automatically having authority on meta.

Well, no. The AC on en:wp is for en:wp. I thought the dispute resolution procedure on meta was more the stewards going "hell no" from time to time. - d.

yes ! and overall, that seems to work :-) ... is not there a more and more noisy rumor of people wanting a new steward election by the way ? ... Ant (stepping deep in it, and tip toe-ing away silently)

Reply

Alphax (Wikipedia email)

7 Nov 7 Nov

4:59 a.m.

Александр Сигачёв wrote:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_Committee Is this policy for all Wikipedias or only for English one? I think, where is an English project bias here, example in "Requests" section (not all local committes have so many members as English Arbitration).

The page is, at present, a copy-paste of [[en:Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee]]. It came into existence because people were asking "what is this arbcom thing", it being mentioned in describing several high-level privileges (CheckUser, Oversight). Feel free to rewrite it... -- Alphax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia "We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales Public key: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax/OpenPGP

Reply

David Gerard

8:12 a.m.

On 07/11/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) <alphasigmax(a)gmail.com> wrote:

The page is, at present, a copy-paste of [[en:Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee]]. It came into existence because people were asking "what is this arbcom thing", it being mentioned in describing several high-level privileges (CheckUser, Oversight). Feel free to rewrite it...

Definitely needs customisation and rewriting for Meta! - d.

Reply

6414

days inactive

6415

days old

wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Manage subscription

5 comments

5 participants

tags (0)

participants (5)

Alphax (Wikipedia email)
Anthere
David Gerard
Ray Saintonge
Александр Сигачёв