There are differences, some of them relevant.
AU didn't include the pictures, neither the general or the specialized.
AU didn't include the references or the outside sites.
AU didn't include much about the religious attitudes, especially the
Islamic. .
WP has a section of links labeled OPPOSITION.
There are a number of relevant topics not included in WP (or at least not
in this article), and perhaps this will inspire me to add them.
Considering that "masturbation" is one of the words likely to be blocked by
filters, it is good to have this information in a reasonably reliable and
accessible source. --but there's a technical question: the link even within
WP is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masturbation.
Possibly this would cause some filters to not accept the page. I found that
neither of my browsers could be set to enable parental controls, so I
couldn't test it.
On 10/17/06, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Angela wrote:
On 10/17/06, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
>What striked me is the subtitle of this site
>
>Kids.Net.Au - kids safe search engine for children, parents and
teachers.
I love the idea of a kid safe search engine for children using primarily
wikipedia :-)
It's actually just a very out of date mirror of Wikipedia (July 2003
according to their [[current events]] page). They don't appear to have
changed anything to make it "child-friendly".
Angela.
I am so disappointed :-(
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
