1. "Legal issues"...perhaps taking edit wars too far? 2. Might there be a way to eventually implement some kind of mapping interface? I mean, a way to tag, within pages, a relative heirarchy and relationship between them. Sorta like "what links here" only done like a site map. Nothing big. :) 3. Bridget - simmer down. I happen to agree with you. But a lot of it is attitude. The overbearing, do nothing, go by the book usually wins out over the attitude of jumping right on it, and fighting it out. A lot depends on how clearly you can think through the real issue, underneath, which is often very general, and usually a question of style. Yes, people are arrogant, insulting, and hypocritical. "Columbus being a slave trader" is an topical example of how people have a hard time reconciling their engrained and iconoclastic views of things with the dirty details - throw morality in there, and anyone who remains too attached to that idol, will skew even moral issues till their completely backwards. see; moral relativism. But in any event, it would be hypocritical to kill even the hypocrites, and time may permit them change. Think before speak, and obey the Murphy's Law that deals with arguing with fools, or the like... -Ztevertigo
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org