Hello.
When accomplishing the requests for switching the logo path, i had to change it for nl:, but i considered that there was a colored Wiki.png. The votes on Meta concerning this were 15 for the new logo, 9 against and 1 abstain.
Do we now accept colored logos or not? Do 15 vs. 9 voted are enough?
Sincerly yours, Fire
Ronny Raschkowan wrote:
Hello.
When accomplishing the requests for switching the logo path, i had to change it for nl:, but i considered that there was a colored Wiki.png. The votes on Meta concerning this were 15 for the new logo, 9 against and 1 abstain.
Do we now accept colored logos or not? Do 15 vs. 9 voted are enough?
Sincerly yours, Fire
This a misunderstanding. WikipediaNL is *not* asking for the colored wikipedia-logo.
1: I ([[nl:gebruiker:walter]]) have requested to activated the option for WikipediaNL to change to logo by use of uploading the file "Wiki.png" after not objection about this by the community.
2: I have received a noticed form user Angela to protect the file wiki.png first. ( http://nl.wikiquote.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:Walter )
3: I have noticed that the file Wiki.png was not the correct logo and have changed it to the Nohat-style logo at 23 jul 2004 11:10 .
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afbeelding:Wiki.png
4: ... and have done the protection.
After your posting about the "nl: Wikipedia asking to use a colored logo " thing on WikipediaNL I have checked again the wiki.png file. I noticed it to be again the colored version. But after several times reloading it changed to the Nohat-style logo. I suppose I and you where looking at the suiqd version of it.
So WikipediaNL is not asking for the to use a colored logo. I am not asking for the to use a colored logo.
Please use my talk page/[[nl:wikipedia:De kroeg]] and not wikipedia-l
Walter Vermeir wrote:
Ronny Raschkowan wrote:
Hello.
When accomplishing the requests for switching the logo path, i had to change it for nl:, but i considered that there was a colored Wiki.png. The votes on Meta concerning this were 15 for the new logo, 9 against and 1 abstain.
Do we now accept colored logos or not? Do 15 vs. 9 voted are enough?
Sincerly yours, Fire
This a misunderstanding. WikipediaNL is *not* asking for the colored wikipedia-logo.
1: I ([[nl:gebruiker:walter]]) have requested to activated the option for WikipediaNL to change to logo by use of uploading the file "Wiki.png" after not objection about this by the community.
2: I have received a noticed form user Angela to protect the file wiki.png first. ( http://nl.wikiquote.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:Walter )
3: I have noticed that the file Wiki.png was not the correct logo and have changed it to the Nohat-style logo at 23 jul 2004 11:10 .
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afbeelding:Wiki.png
4: ... and have done the protection.
After your posting about the "nl: Wikipedia asking to use a colored logo " thing on WikipediaNL I have checked again the wiki.png file. I noticed it to be again the colored version. But after several times reloading it changed to the Nohat-style logo. I suppose I and you where looking at the suiqd version of it.
So WikipediaNL is not asking for the to use a colored logo. I am not asking for the to use a colored logo.
Please use my talk page/[[nl:wikipedia:De kroeg]] and not wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Hello.
Yes, I am sorry, I had the Wiki.png coloured in the cache, from yesterday, though you uploaded the nohat - logo at 11am today.
I used that list because I thought you would want to have the coloured one, and wanted to ask how the policy was. I think this is the best list to ask for that issue. The problem was that there was another one - But as far as you uploaded the right logo, the misunderstanding is clarified now - I am sorry - My evil cache is a lier :-)
Sincerly yours, Fire
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org