But no reason for either one of them to clutter up the Recent Changes page with minor edits. If I am looking at the last 200 changes, every chess move subtracts one possibly interesting change from my list. I think it is bad manners.
I didn't think playing chess would be such a big deal! In reality I probably only make at *most* 10 minor edits per *day* playing chess. That is nothing. One person who is save happy will make that in 1 minute. I don't mind ceasing such activities if people so desire, but I don't enjoy being a scapegoat. Ram-Man
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
|From: Digital Addictions Software digitaladdictions@yahoo.com |Sender: wikipedia-l-admin@wikipedia.org |Reply-To: wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org |Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:45:34 -0800 (PST) | |> But no reason for either one of them to clutter up the Recent Changes |> page with minor edits. If I am looking at the last 200 changes, every |> chess move subtracts one possibly interesting change from my list. I |> think it is bad manners. | |I didn't think playing chess would be such a big deal! In reality I probably |only make at *most* 10 minor edits per *day* playing chess. That is nothing. |One person who is save happy will make that in 1 minute. I don't mind ceasing |such activities if people so desire, but I don't enjoy being a scapegoat. | Ram-Man | |
Just make them minor edits and I'll have ten more chances to see something interesting (like say a reference to something going on in some small town that I could add to its entry). Then I'll go complain to the save-happy person.
Tom
Tom Parmenter wrote:
|From: Digital Addictions Software digitaladdictions@yahoo.com |Sender: wikipedia-l-admin@wikipedia.org |Reply-To: wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org |Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:45:34 -0800 (PST) | |> But no reason for either one of them to clutter up the Recent Changes |> page with minor edits. If I am looking at the last 200 changes, every |> chess move subtracts one possibly interesting change from my list. I |> think it is bad manners. | |I didn't think playing chess would be such a big deal! In reality I probably |only make at *most* 10 minor edits per *day* playing chess. That is nothing. |One person who is save happy will make that in 1 minute. I don't mind ceasing |such activities if people so desire, but I don't enjoy being a scapegoat. | Ram-Man | |
Just make them minor edits and I'll have ten more chances to see something interesting (like say a reference to something going on in some small town that I could add to its entry). Then I'll go complain to the save-happy person.
Tom
Even better, play on Meta. (WikipediaWeeders have minor edits set to display!)
Digital Addictions Software wrote:
But no reason for either one of them to clutter up the Recent Changes page with minor edits. If I am looking at the last 200 changes, every chess move subtracts one possibly interesting change from my list. I think it is bad manners.
I didn't think playing chess would be such a big deal! In reality I probably only make at *most* 10 minor edits per *day* playing chess. That is nothing. One person who is save happy will make that in 1 minute. I don't mind ceasing such activities if people so desire, but I don't enjoy being a scapegoat. Ram-Man
Perhaps it could be moved to meta.wikipedia.org?
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org