This is just me but ... I hate Cologne Blue.
-- Toby Bartels toby+wikipedia-l@math.ucr.edu
--- Toby Bartels toby+wikipedia-l@math.ucr.edu wrote:
This is just me but ... I hate Cologne Blue.
This is just me, but ... I love Cologne Blue.
Perhaps you are scared of change. Perhaps you are a Wikipedia fundamentalist. Perhaps you just don't like Cologne Blue.
-- Stephen Gilbert
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com
Stephen Gilbert wrote:
--- Toby Bartels toby+wikipedia-l@math.ucr.edu wrote:
This is just me but ... I hate Cologne Blue.
This is just me, but ... I love Cologne Blue.
Perhaps you are scared of change. Perhaps you are a Wikipedia fundamentalist. Perhaps you just don't like Cologne Blue.
The toolbar needs some reworking for maximum usability (someone recently posted some suggestions for that in wikitech-l), but by and large I find that my eyes are seared out by the ugliness of the old interface when I visit Wikipedia from a computer where I'm not logged in with CB selected.
Those who prefer to sleep on cold stone floors, eat naught but cold oatmeal, and spend two hours each morning flagellating themselves to expiate the sins of their fellow Wikipedians are free to select the classic skin.
Meanwhile, those of us who prefer that the site not scare away potential contributors on their first visit by presenting only its bath-avoiding, flea-infested, rib-protruding side, will continue to lobby for making CB the default look.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
Brion VIBBER wrote:
Stephen Gilbert wrote:
--- Toby Bartels toby+wikipedia-l@math.ucr.edu wrote:
This is just me but ... I hate Cologne Blue.
This is just me, but ... I love Cologne Blue.
Perhaps you are scared of change. Perhaps you are a Wikipedia fundamentalist. Perhaps you just don't like Cologne Blue.
The toolbar needs some reworking for maximum usability (someone recently posted some suggestions for that in wikitech-l), but by and large I find that my eyes are seared out by the ugliness of the old interface when I visit Wikipedia from a computer where I'm not logged in with CB selected.
Those who prefer to sleep on cold stone floors, eat naught but cold oatmeal, and spend two hours each morning flagellating themselves to expiate the sins of their fellow Wikipedians are free to select the classic skin.
Meanwhile, those of us who prefer that the site not scare away potential contributors on their first visit by presenting only its bath-avoiding, flea-infested, rib-protruding side, will continue to lobby for making CB the default look.
I hate cologne blue for two reasons - firstly, it's a san-serif font which is not as good for large slabs of text as a serif font. There's a reason why virtually all books are typeset in good old time-roman or something similar - it's easier on the eyes...
and secondly, it doesn't have the basic menu options up the top of the screen. When I looked at it I had trouble finding 'random page' and 'recent changes' and 'edit page' because they were buried in the busy sidebar instead of being neatly arrayed along the top by themselves.
Could someone perhaps design a CologneBlue Mk2, with the following changes: * serif font * clearer toolbar * key links along the top * include the wikipedia logo
I agree with all the objections to CB, but I also agree with the need for a cleaner-looking interface to welcome newcomers.
Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
Brion VIBBER wrote: Meanwhile, those of us who prefer that the site not scare away potential contributors on their first visit by presenting only its bath-avoiding, flea-infested, rib-protruding side, will continue to lobby for making CB the default look.
I hate cologne blue for two reasons - firstly, it's a san-serif font which is not as good for large slabs of text as a serif font. There's a reason why virtually all books are typeset in good old time-roman or something similar - it's easier on the eyes...
and secondly, it doesn't have the basic menu options up the top of the screen. When I looked at it I had trouble finding 'random page' and 'recent changes' and 'edit page' because they were buried in the busy sidebar instead of being neatly arrayed along the top by themselves.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org