On Tuesday 30 July 2002 12:01 pm, you wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to try & reorganise naming conventions, and tie them in with things like presentation conventions, Wiki Projects and "basic topic" pages. I'm still mulling it over, and I'e got to the point where I'd like to start laying out ideas. There's no way this can be cleanly refactored overnight, so I'm thinking of using the Meta wiki, to first set out a page scheme and then start refactoring. That way "normal service" (!) won't be disturbed on the wikipedia: namespace. Any objections if I discreetly set up in a corner of MetaWikipedia?
tarquin
If you are planning on doing major work then I also suggest that you do as Lee indicated and make a /Temp page so that everybody can monitor the process and help out easily (especially me since I promised to do the exact same thing). However, if you are doing work that will not really leave the page looking incomplete or messy during the process then I say we just un-protect the page and let you go at it (I can't remember, are your a sysop? We have so many now...).
Aside....
Frankly, I really don't know why we still have a metapedia -- it is mainly a repository of junk from the main site and has never really served its intended purpose of meta discussion, random chit chat about the project and working on projects.
In my opinion having two separate RecentChanges for Wikipedia and Metapedia is why activity is comatose on the meta. But then I would be uncomfortable about having something like a meta namespace unless the display of meta pages in RecentChanges were turned off by default for users -- we are first an encyclopedia not a social club.
--mav
--- Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
In my opinion having two separate RecentChanges for Wikipedia and Metapedia is why activity is comatose on the meta. But then I would be uncomfortable about having something like a meta namespace unless the display of meta pages in RecentChanges were turned off by default for users -- we are first an encyclopedia not a social club.
Software developers, how difficult would it be to have the ability to display Recent Changes by namespaces? There could be checkboxes on the preferences page allowing people to select which namespaces would be displayed.
Perhaps the more important question is, would such a feature be a big performance hit?
Stephen G.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
Daniel Mayer wrote:
On Tuesday 30 July 2002 12:01 pm, you wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to try & reorganise naming conventions ....... Any objections if I discreetly set up in a corner of MetaWikipedia?
tarquin
If you are planning on doing major work then I also suggest that you do as Lee indicated and make a /Temp page so that everybody can monitor the process and help out easily (especially me since I promised to do the exact same thing). However, if you are doing work that will not really leave the page
looking incomplete or messy during the process then I say we just un-protect the page and let you go at it (I can't remember, are your a sysop? We have so many now...).
It's major work in the sense that the page structure & names may be different to what currently exists. I'm not *exactly* sure what I'm aiming for yet either... hence my idea to set up fresh. A link on the existing Naming pages to the work in progress would be good, as I'd be very glad of input :-) I'm not a sysop -- could I be made one?
tarquin
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org