Deleting particle physics was certainly a dumb thing to do (though easy to deal with). His contributions to the "money" article, if he did revision 6, seem to me to be quite good. It looks like he took a very brief article and usefully expanded the history, from commodity money to fiat money. Even his "agenda-based" paragraphs are properly put into context, by stating that it's a "green economist" position. His edits to "artificial intelligence" didn't help much, but the article was already a mostly incomprehensible mish-mash, and what he did is certainly no worse than what just about every editor I know (including myself) has done at least one point. Are there other entries? Or is the hooplah mostly about his meta-rants? I don't see that much evidence that he's trying to violate the mission of Wikipedia, or even subvert it to his own kooky ends. He seems to respect the mission, and thinks that people don't have the right understanding of what NPOV means. I personally think that NPOV concept has flaws as being the guiding principle for Wikipedia, since it's such a semantically flexible term. That said, he's obviously self-centered and self-righteous. Has he made any edits in the last few days? --tc