I think that the proposed image use policy is ready for list approval and final changes and/or discussion. Please see: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy A lack of any posts about the proposed image policy will be viewed as acceptance of this pages as-is (yeah, like that is going to happen; I had to say it anyway). Another thing that I would like list members to look at is an article definition FAQ that is being worked on that, when complete will be sublinked under the first occurrence of the word "article" on the main page (otherwise the statement "you can edit any article right now" might seem odd to a newbie when the main page is obviously not editable). See: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_an_article What is really needed now a short section explaining what the automatic statistics actually consider to be articles. One thing that has already been mentioned is that it looks like disambiguation pages are considered to be articles by the software when very few humans would consider index pages to be either encyclopedia of almanac-like articles. There is also a question as to whether a list without any commas in a "list of" article could potentially /not/ be considered to be an article by the software. BTW, it would be nice if the statistics could somehow estimate the numbers of the two types of articles wikipedia has; encyclopedia articles and supporting almanac-like articles (lists). -- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)