I think I speak for most of the Dutch Wikipedians if I say: * Neither the Dutch Wikimedia Foundation (Stichting Wikimedia Nederland) nor the Dutch Wikimedia Association (Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland) has the right to influence the content and procedures of the Dutch Wikipedia * The board of neither has any formal special position on the Dutch Wikipedia * At least the Dutch Wikimedia Foundation should not be allowed to speak in name of the Dutch Wikipedia * The Wikimedia Foundation is hereby requested not to give the Dutch Wikimedia Foundation the status of chapter or any similar status
Thank you.
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
On 4/18/06, Andre Engels andreengels@gmail.com wrote:
I think I speak for most of the Dutch Wikipedians if I say:
- Neither the Dutch Wikimedia Foundation (Stichting Wikimedia
Nederland) nor the Dutch Wikimedia Association (Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland) has the right to influence the content and procedures of the Dutch Wikipedia
- The board of neither has any formal special position on the Dutch Wikipedia
- At least the Dutch Wikimedia Foundation should not be allowed to
speak in name of the Dutch Wikipedia
- The Wikimedia Foundation is hereby requested not to give the Dutch
Wikimedia Foundation the status of chapter or any similar status
I don't mean to dredge up grievances, but I'm just wondering where all this is coming from. Have either of these two organisations _attempted_ to obtain some formalised special role? Even if the Dutch Wikimedia Foundation were a "chapter" (whatever that means) why would such status give it any rights over [[:nl]]?
Is there any precedent, anywhere, for "Wikimedia Foundation/Association for country X" having a formalised special role at "Wikipedia for language Y", where country X is strongly associated with language Y?
I certainly hope not. At the very least, this would breach the linguistic/national separation we're tried hard to maintain. The only mildly plausible argument I could ever see made would be for legal issues specific to a country, but even these wouldn't be specific to a language. The hate speech laws in Germany, for example, would apply as much to contributors to [[:en]] as they would to [[de:]].
Steve
2006/4/18, Stephen Forrest stephen.forrest@gmail.com:
I don't mean to dredge up grievances, but I'm just wondering where all this is coming from. Have either of these two organisations _attempted_ to obtain some formalised special role?
The issue is that both have been created. The Association explicitly states in its regulations that it has no influence on the content of the sites. The Foundation's regulations are based on the Association's, but this specific regulation was, apparently on purpose, taken out. Which led some people on Wikipedia to fear that the Foundation DID intend to influence Wikipedia, or that it could be FORCED to do so even if it did not want to.
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org