Hi,
134 to 137 were put on the voting sheet after the deadline, too, I believe. This not being a problem seemed like a good example of WikiLove, in my eyes. See [http://meta.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=International_logos_(126-150)&a...] for example of voting in place without them.
Bye, Till we *)
--------------
Sorry, but I did not understand what you meant above.
Do you mean it was not an act of wikilove to point out to the problem ?
I just know one thing
When I looked the other day, I just saw a user had replaced with *his* logo (submitted after the deadline), the logo of *another* user (logo number 67).
I had no time to check if I had really understood the problem, so I just mentionned it for others to check
Clearly, that was a mistake. But in any case, I think it was *not* a good idea to let someone replace the official logos of another by his own.
Perhaps my saying was not wikilove toward the author of 138, but it was toward author of 67 :-)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org