One small problem here. What if there are two discrete entries (I'm struggling for an example here), one spelling of which has no diacritics and an equivalent spelling of the "same" word (yet with a diacritic) and a wholly different meaning?
That's no different from any other disambiguation job.
0
I agree. The corollary of this, therefore, is that everything should (in the fullness of time) be wholly disambiguated.
----- Original Message ----- From: lcrocker@nupedia.com To: wikipedia-l@nupedia.com Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:36 AM Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Proposed addition to wikipedia: Naming conventions
One small problem here. What if there are two discrete entries (I'm struggling for an example here), one spelling of which has no diacritics and an equivalent spelling of the "same" word (yet with a diacritic) and a wholly different meaning?
That's no different from any other disambiguation job.
0
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org