http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/
no links or reference is visible to wikipedia.
Peter Gervai wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/
no links or reference is visible to wikipedia. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
I have contacted Science Daily by E-mail, and they have now adjusted the text on their site, and included a back-link to the article, and a link to the GFDL text on each page, as follows (with my line wraps):
From http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/astronomy
<div><b>Note:</b> The <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/astronomy">original source of this article</a> can be found on the main Wikipedia Web site.<br><br> This article is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.</div>
There is also an "edit this page" link which links back to Wikipedia.
-- Neil
Neil Harris wrote:
I have contacted Science Daily by E-mail, and they have now adjusted the text on their site, and included a back-link to the article
More often than not, their links are broken links. For example: http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/galileo_galilei links to http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/galileo_galilei which redirects to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_galilei as opposed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
Timwi
Timwi wrote:
Neil Harris wrote:
I have contacted Science Daily by E-mail, and they have now adjusted the text on their site, and included a back-link to the article
More often than not, their links are broken links. For example: http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/galileo_galilei links to http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/galileo_galilei which redirects to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_galilei as opposed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
Timwi
Can you give them a quick heads-up about that? They were very polite and responsive when I contacted them earlier today. They appear to get the _edit_ link right for that page, so it shouldn't be too much scripting for them.
They also seem to have a problem with some (all?) year links...
-- Neil
Neil Harris wrote:
Timwi wrote:
Neil Harris wrote:
I have contacted Science Daily by E-mail, and they have now adjusted the text on their site, and included a back-link to the article
More often than not, their links are broken links. For example: http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/galileo_galilei links to http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/galileo_galilei which redirects to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_galilei as opposed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
Can you give them a quick heads-up about that?
Yeah, I have. They've fixed the capitalisation issue.
Peter Gervai wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/
no links or reference is visible to wikipedia.
It's been listed since November 2003:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3ACopies_of_Wikipedia_content_(high_d...
There's about 70 mirrors listed now, so there's probably not much point posting to the mailing list every time we find one. [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks]] has a procedure which you can follow in cases of non-compliance.
-- Tim Starling
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 05:35:10PM +1000, Tim Starling wrote:
There's about 70 mirrors listed now, so there's probably not much point posting to the mailing list every time we find one. [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks]] has a procedure which you can follow in cases of non-compliance.
Now I know. Thanks.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org