Hello,
we begin to face massive anonymous / non-anonymous contributions on topics related to one another such as nationalism, racism, racialism in a clearly oriented direction.
example new definition : Le nationalisme est une politique dont les objectifs sont essentiellement l'indépendance, l'unité et la prospérité de sa propre nation et de son peuple.
Nationalism is a policy whitch goals are essentialy the independance, the unity and the prosperity of its own nation and people.
(sic but not the problem) No mistakes in translation "own nation" refers to policy.
We have many "anonymous" rewriting of sensible topics such as racialism, and racism
For instance, now, we explain why racism is totally understandable and acceptable especialy on a scientific point of view. The definition had had its change totally re-oriented without any discussions.
These people don't intend to respect the moral contract of wikipedia. Wake-up if you just let it happen, you will face quite a problem. Now it is easy to face 3 people with a current team of ~20 active contributors, but when it will be twice as the original contributors you might be quite annoyed.
I know I'll get the blame for being alarmist and «paranoid», but please if you are not convinced just wonder what if it was true ? True, that we get these people trashing all the wikipedia project's spirit and part of the content, wouldn't it worth a try to imagine the solution we can consider to face that problem ?
PS: Sorry for not respecting the netiquette and posting so much so soon.
julien tayon wrote:
Hello,
example new definition : Le nationalisme est une politique dont les objectifs sont essentiellement l'indépendance, l'unité et la prospérité de sa propre nation et de son peuple.
Ceci est bien la définition d'un certain sens du mot, mais elle n'est pas complète et ainsi décevante. Je suggérerais qu'elle soit améliorée. Toute seule, ce n'est pas quelque chose pour s'inquièter.
L'action de cet individu qui donnerait cause pour faire attention, c'est qu'il a effacé les pages personelles de trois autres Wikipédiens. Ça c'est du vandalisme.
Eclecticology
--- julien tayon julien@tayon.net wrote:
Hello,
we begin to face massive anonymous / non-anonymous contributions on topics related to one another such as nationalism, racism, racialism in a clearly oriented direction.
example new definition : Le nationalisme est une politique dont les objectifs sont essentiellement l'ind�pendance, l'unit� et la prosp�rit� de sa propre nation et de son peuple.
Nationalism is a policy whitch goals are essentialy the independance, the unity and the prosperity of its own nation and people.
(sic but not the problem) No mistakes in translation "own nation" refers to policy.
We have many "anonymous" rewriting of sensible topics such as racialism, and racism
For instance, now, we explain why racism is totally understandable and acceptable especialy on a scientific point of view. The definition had had its change totally re-oriented without any discussions.
These people don't intend to respect the moral contract of wikipedia. Wake-up if you just let it happen, you will face quite a problem. Now it is easy to face 3 people with a current team of ~20 active contributors, but when it will be twice as the original contributors you might be quite annoyed.
I know I'll get the blame for being alarmist and �paranoid�, but please if you are not convinced just wonder what if it was true ? True, that we get these people trashing all the wikipedia project's spirit and part of the content, wouldn't it worth a try to imagine the solution we can consider to face that problem ?
PS: Sorry for not respecting the netiquette and posting so much so soon.
Et pourquoi ne pas traiter autrui comme si il �tait en train de contribuer � l'effort collectif ?
Une contribution anonyme peut �tre extr�mement b�n�fique, tout comme une contribution attribu�e peut �tre source de d�sagr�ment.
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org