Bonjour !
J'en ai assez de ces administrateurs (bureaucrates, stewards, etc. d'autres gros mots) tous plus arrogants, incompétents et vandales les uns que les autres. Ils sont ignares (à part une ''valuable'' maîtrise des /manga/...), et considèrent généralement les Wikipedia comme leur propriété personnelle, d'où il convient de chasser tous les intrus. Ils trahissent les idéaux de la Fondation Wikimedia. Les pires de tous se trouvent dans la fr.Wikipedia (il conviendrait de les révoquer *en bloc* !). Mais d'autres ne sont pas mal non plus (bn, bg, wuu...). Je vous demande de participer à ma consultation du ''vulgum pecus'', à savoir nous :
* http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipetã_myangekõi:Administradores ;
* <http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedijos_aptarimas:Administratoriai#R%C3%A9v...
.
Salut,
Budelberger, Richard (inscrit sous le nom de « Budelberger » dans tous les Wikis, si on veut vérifier ses « contributions »).
Hi,
Can somebody translate this in English please?
Cheers, Huib
2008/10/21 Huib Laurens sterkebak@gmail.com:
Hi,
Can somebody translate this in English please?
Loosely, with my dubious French -
----
I am not happy with the administrators (bureaucrats, stewards, "and other big words") who are all as bad as each other. They .. treat Wikipedia as their personal property, and chase away any intruders. They betray the ideals of the Foundation. The worst are on the French wikipedia, but others are no better (bn, bg, wuu). Please participate in my consultation of [the masses], ie us:
* http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipetã_myangekõi:Administradores ;
* <http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedijos_aptarimas:Administratoriai#R%C3%A9v...
----
Astute readers will no doubt wonder why the consultation is requested to take place, apparently in French, on the Latvian and Guarani Wikipedias...
----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com To: wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 2:35 PM Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l]Révocations d'Administrateurs.
2008/10/21 Huib Laurens sterkebak@gmail.com:
Hi,
Can somebody translate this in English please?
Loosely, with my dubious French -
I am not happy with the administrators (bureaucrats, stewards, "and other big words") who are all as bad as each other. They .. treat Wikipedia as their personal property, and chase away any intruders. They betray the ideals of the Foundation. The worst are on the French wikipedia, but others are no better (bn, bg, wuu). Please participate in my consultation of [the masses], ie us:
http://gn.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mba%27ech%C4%A9ch%C4%A9%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=&year=2008&month=10, qui confirme parfaitement ce que je dis : la gn.Wikipedia, comme la lt.Wikipedia, est la propriété personnelle du dénommé « Hugo.arg ». Avec la bénédiction de tous ?..
Même chose (message barré). Avec de plus des menaces (d'un bureaucrate) :
http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naudotojo_aptarimas:Budelberger.
Astute readers will no doubt wonder why the consultation is requested to take place, apparently in French, on the Latvian
Lithuanian.
and Guarani Wikipedias...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
Budelberger, Richard.
----- Original Message ----- From: Budelberger, Richard To: Wikipedia-L Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l]Révocations d'Administrateurs.
confirme parfaitement ce que je dis : la gn.Wikipedia, comme la lt.Wikipedia, est la propriété personnelle du dénommé « Hugo.arg ». Avec la bénédiction de tous ?..
Même chose (message barré). Avec de plus des menaces (d'un bureaucrate) :
<http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naudotojo_aptarimas:Budelberger>.
http://lt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specialus%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=&year=2008&month=10 !
Budelberger, Richard.
----- Original Message ----- From: Budelberger, Richard To: Wikipedia-L Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l]Révocations d'Administrateurs.
confirme parfaitement ce que je dis : la gn.Wikipedia, comme la lt.Wikipedia, est la propriété personnelle du dénommé « Hugo.arg ». Avec la bénédiction de tous ?..
Même chose (message barré). Avec de plus des menaces (d'un bureaucrate) :
<http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naudotojo_aptarimas:Budelberger>.
http://lt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specialus%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=&year=2008&month=10 !
Budelberger, Richard.
Yo creo que el problema con la gn.wp es que Hugo.arg no sabe hablar el guaraní. ¿Por qué otorgamos acceso administrativo a tales dictadores que no saben hablar el idioma local? Este chavo es un lituano que nunca ha viajado a Paraguay, Argentina, o Brasil, los cuales son los países donde se habla el idioma guaraní.
---
I think the problem with gn.wp is that Hugo.arg doesn't speak Guarani. Why do we grant administrative access to such dictators who don't even speak the local tongue? This guy is a Lithuanian who has never been to Paraguay, Argentina, or Brazil, which are the countries where Guarani is spoken.
Mark
On 21/10/2008, Budelberger, Richard budelberger.richard@wanadoo.fr wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: Budelberger, Richard To: Wikipedia-L Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l]Révocations d'Administrateurs.
confirme parfaitement ce que je dis : la gn.Wikipedia, comme la lt.Wikipedia, est la propriété personnelle du dénommé « Hugo.arg ». Avec la bénédiction de tous ?..
http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedijos_aptarimas:Administratoriai#Révocation_d'Administrateurs
Même chose (message barré). Avec de plus des menaces (d'un bureaucrate) :
<http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naudotojo_aptarimas:Budelberger>.
http://lt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specialus%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=&year=2008&month=10 !
Budelberger, Richard.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Mark Williamson wrote:
Yo creo que el problema con la gn.wp es que Hugo.arg no sabe hablar el guaraní. ¿Por qué otorgamos acceso administrativo a tales dictadores que no saben hablar el idioma local? Este chavo es un lituano que nunca ha viajado a Paraguay, Argentina, o Brasil, los cuales son los países donde se habla el idioma guaraní.
I think the problem with gn.wp is that Hugo.arg doesn't speak Guarani. Why do we grant administrative access to such dictators who don't even speak the local tongue? This guy is a Lithuanian who has never been to Paraguay, Argentina, or Brazil, which are the countries where Guarani is spoken.
Mark \
I believe he's discussing http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puruh%C3%A1ra_myangek%C3%B5i:Hugo.arg#Suppressions, and is complaining his templates have been deleted. Hugo.arg, who does not in fact, speak Guarani seems to have in spite of that deficiency done a great deal of work in making the Guarani Wikipedia grow.
Here is where he earned the rights from two community members...(including Kanon6917 who happens to live in Lima and speaks a small bit of Querana) http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipet%C3%A3_myangek%C3%B5i:Tekohapegua#Reques...
Anyway, Richard, if there is a serious dispute with Hugo.arg, you should bring it to meta:RFC.
Cary
It can often be a good thing if someone who doesn't speak a language does a lot to make a Wikipedia larger.
However, it can also create a harmful environment. (No particular accusation against Hugo.arg - I don't know the situation there)
When we have a Wikipedia with 5000 pages full of what appears to be good writing, that is good... but what if it's written in very poor language?
En.wp and other large Wikipedias are able to absorb text written by people with not-so-good commands of the target language, but only because they already have a large volunteer base and the vast majority of existing text is already up to par. Imagine, however, trying to start work at a Wiki that is in very poor language, difficult to understand, obviously written by someone who has only studied your language for a semester or two and is using a dictionary to get by. This isn't so bad if there are only 100 pages or so, but what if there are 1000, or 2000? This seems unacceptable to me.
On 23/10/2008, Cary Bass cary@wikimedia.org wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
Yo creo que el problema con la gn.wp es que Hugo.arg no sabe hablar el guaraní. ¿Por qué otorgamos acceso administrativo a tales dictadores que no saben hablar el idioma local? Este chavo es un lituano que nunca ha viajado a Paraguay, Argentina, o Brasil, los cuales son los países donde se habla el idioma guaraní.
I think the problem with gn.wp is that Hugo.arg doesn't speak Guarani. Why do we grant administrative access to such dictators who don't even speak the local tongue? This guy is a Lithuanian who has never been to Paraguay, Argentina, or Brazil, which are the countries where Guarani is spoken.
Mark \
I believe he's discussing http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puruh%C3%A1ra_myangek%C3%B5i:Hugo.arg#Suppressions, and is complaining his templates have been deleted. Hugo.arg, who does not in fact, speak Guarani seems to have in spite of that deficiency done a great deal of work in making the Guarani Wikipedia grow.
Here is where he earned the rights from two community members...(including Kanon6917 who happens to live in Lima and speaks a small bit of Querana) http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipet%C3%A3_myangek%C3%B5i:Tekohapegua#Reques...
Anyway, Richard, if there is a serious dispute with Hugo.arg, you should bring it to meta:RFC.
Cary
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
2008/10/21 Huib Laurens sterkebak@gmail.com:
Hi,
Can somebody translate this in English please?
Pending someone that actually speak French coming along, here's Google's attempt:
"Revocation of Directors.
Hello!
I am tired of these directors (bureaucrats, stewards, etc. Other big words) any more arrogant, incompetent and vandals as each other. They are ignorant (from a ''valuable''control / manga and generally /...), the Wikipedia as their personal property, which should to hunt all intruders. They betray the ideals of the Foundation Wikimedia. Worst of all are in the fr.Wikipedia (should revoke block * *!). But others are not bad either (bn, bg, wuu ...). I ask you to participate my consultation''vulgum pecus'', namely us:
* http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipetã_myangekõi:Administradores;
* <# Http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedijos_aptarimas:Administratoriai Révocation_d'Administrateurs
.
Hi,
Budelberger, Richard (registered under the name "Budelberger" Wikis in all, if you want to check his "contributions")."
I think the rough translation is "ADMIN ABUSE! ADMIN ABUSE!".
Problems with administrators on a given project should be dealt with on that project. Trying to hold cross-project talks on the subject are liable to failure because of difference in policy and culture and, not least, language.
Google translation of my reply (if someone wants to give an accurate translation, you're welcome to do so):
Problèmes avec les administrateurs sur un projet donné doivent être traitées sur ce projet. Essayer de tenir les pourparlers projet sur le sujet sont de nature à l'échec en raison de la différence dans la politique et de la culture et, non moins, de la langue.
Thanks for the translations
Cheers, Huib
2008/10/21, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com:
2008/10/21 Huib Laurens sterkebak@gmail.com:
Hi,
Can somebody translate this in English please?
Pending someone that actually speak French coming along, here's Google's attempt:
"Revocation of Directors.
Hello!
I am tired of these directors (bureaucrats, stewards, etc. Other big words) any more arrogant, incompetent and vandals as each other. They are ignorant (from a ''valuable''control / manga and generally /...), the Wikipedia as their personal property, which should to hunt all intruders. They betray the ideals of the Foundation Wikimedia. Worst of all are in the fr.Wikipedia (should revoke block * *!). But others are not bad either (bn, bg, wuu ...). I ask you to participate my consultation''vulgum pecus'', namely us:
http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipetã_myangekõi:Administradores;
<# Http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedijos_aptarimas:Administratoriai
Révocation_d'Administrateurs
.
Hi, Budelberger, Richard (registered under the name "Budelberger"
Wikis in all, if you want to check his "contributions")."
I think the rough translation is "ADMIN ABUSE! ADMIN ABUSE!".
Problems with administrators on a given project should be dealt with on that project. Trying to hold cross-project talks on the subject are liable to failure because of difference in policy and culture and, not least, language.
Google translation of my reply (if someone wants to give an accurate translation, you're welcome to do so):
Problèmes avec les administrateurs sur un projet donné doivent être traitées sur ce projet. Essayer de tenir les pourparlers projet sur le sujet sont de nature à l'échec en raison de la différence dans la politique et de la culture et, non moins, de la langue. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
If there are any problems with any stewards, please contact the stewards directly or if it's a privacy issue contact the ombudsmen commission. But please read about the steward policy before and check if there are really any violations of it. (My French is not good enough to translate this, and Google translations suck, so I stick to English.)
Th.
2008/10/21, Budelberger, Richard budelberger.richard@wanadoo.fr:
Bonjour !
J'en ai assez de ces administrateurs (bureaucrates, stewards, etc. d'autres gros mots) tous plus arrogants, incompétents et vandales les uns que les autres. Ils sont ignares (à part une ''valuable'' maîtrise des /manga/...), et considèrent généralement les Wikipedia comme leur propriété personnelle, d'où il convient de chasser tous les intrus. Ils trahissent les idéaux de la Fondation Wikimedia. Les pires de tous se trouvent dans la fr.Wikipedia (il conviendrait de les révoquer *en bloc* !). Mais d'autres ne sont pas mal non plus (bn, bg, wuu...). Je vous demande de participer à ma consultation du ''vulgum pecus'', à savoir nous :
http://gn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipetã_myangekõi:Administradores ;
<http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedijos_aptarimas:Administratoriai#R%C3%A9v...
.
----- Original Message ----- From: Budelberger, Richard To: Wikipedia-L Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:54 AM Subject: Révocations d'Administrateurs.
http://zu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Umnyango_wamgwamanda&action=history.
Salut,
Budelberger.
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org