sometime in the near future? Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:54:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: 200308170154.14868.maveric149@yahoo.com Status: RO X-Status: Q X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState:
Karl Eichwalder wrote:
I still believe contents is more important; all these links, esp. these navigation links are superfluous. A good search engine is all you need -- frankly, navigations links are a waste of resources (time and bandwidth). I admit, it nice to click around but going this way you usually will not find the info you are looking for.
Ah - a true believer in search engines. As with all true believers, there isn't any point arguing with you.
--mav
Karl Eichwalder wrote:
I still believe contents is more important; all these links, esp. these navigation links are superfluous. A good search engine is all you need...
Mavwrote: Ah - a true believer in search engines. As with all true believers, there isn't any point arguing with you.
Oh Jeez :)
But I love the demo -- the idea, the look, everything... including the fact that its notion of *{separate-but-related editable dataspaces} is quite in line with what we need on the wiki to deal with *editing IL links {metadata} and anything else people can think of. Simple concept -- how hard is it to do?
1. Niggle --> I would like to see a mouseover/mouseoff toggle option for the annotes. Or maybe a timer for closing annotes. (Call me and forty million other surfers lazy - we prefer to hover than click, if possible. :)
Ergonomicist Steve
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org