I'm always suprised when I go to the plej vizitataj pagxoj (most visited pages) in the Esperanto Wikipedia and I see:
1. Cxefpagxo (19094-foje) 2. Svedio (3181-foje) 3. Sxekspiro (707-foje) 4. Esperanto-muziko (664-foje) 5. Germanio (604-foje)
Having Shakespeare, Esperanto music and Germany don't surprise me, but does anyone have a clue why the article on Sweden is so popular?! This has been bugging me for a while now... :-)
http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciala:Popularpages
Mi cxiam surprizigxas kiam mi vizitas la plej vizitatajn pagxojn en la Vikipedio kaj vidas (la liston supre). Sxekspiro, Esperanto-muziko kaj Germanio ne surprizas min, sed cxu iu scias kial la artikolo pri Svedio estas tiom populara?! Cxi tio "gxenis" min dum iom da tempo nun... :-)
Thanks / Dankon, Chuck
===== Interesting fact: Google returns more results for "Esperanto" than for "Catalan" ---------------------------------------- Learn Esperanto! - http://www.lernu.net/ Enciklopedio: http://eo.wikipedia.org/
___________________________________________________ Yahoo! Móviles Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es
On 02-02-2003, Chuck Smith wrote thusly :
I'm always suprised when I go to the plej vizitataj pagxoj (most visited pages) in the Esperanto Wikipedia and I see:
- Cxefpagxo (19094-foje)
- Svedio (3181-foje)
- Sxekspiro (707-foje)
- Esperanto-muziko (664-foje)
- Germanio (604-foje)
Having Shakespeare, Esperanto music and Germany don't surprise me, but does anyone have a clue why the article on Sweden is so popular?! This has been bugging me for a while now... :-)
http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciala:Popularpages
Mi cxiam surprizigxas kiam mi vizitas la plej vizitatajn pagxojn en la Vikipedio kaj vidas (la liston supre). Sxekspiro, Esperanto-muziko kaj Germanio ne surprizas min, sed cxu iu scias kial la artikolo pri Svedio estas tiom populara?! Cxi tio "gxenis" min dum iom da tempo nun... :-)
Hi,
We, at the Polish Wikipedia, were told by Tomasz Wegrzanowski, that it is because of Lars' script continously trying to estimate loading times of certain pages. Surely Sweden, his homeland, is his favourite.
I wonder that we (intl Wikipedias) still have the access counter running, while at the English WP it is disabled.
Regards, Kpjas.
On dim, 2003-02-02 at 01:56, Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz wrote:
I wonder that we (intl Wikipedias) still have the access counter running, while at the English WP it is disabled.
It was disabled mainly for performance reasons -- for every page view, the database has to be updated with the incremented counter. And lately, we've been getting A LOT of page views; when the updates get backed up waiting for a slow save or other query, everything else has to wait. The English WP gets the vast majority of the traffic, and thus causes the majority of our problems. ;)
The other wikis still run them because there's little benefit to disabling their counters -- lower traffic and smaller databases, so the updates don't get backed up and there's no problem.
However, the counters are so limited that it's not clear just how useful they are -- they don't distinguish been old and recent traffic; they don't distinguish between one person loading a page over and over and ten different people looking at it; they don't distinguish googlebot from a human. They're probably going to get replaced with a smarter counter at some point
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
--- Brion Vibber brion@pobox.com wrote:
However, the counters are so limited that it's not clear just how useful they are -- they don't distinguish been old and recent traffic; they don't distinguish between one person loading a page over and over and ten different people looking at it; they don't distinguish googlebot from a human.
I am in favor of getting rid of them, at least in their current form. Meaningless numbers are a lot worse than no numbers, especially if people are not aware of the extent of their meaninglessness.
Axel
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org