The Moldovan Wikipedia community has decided to close down the Wikipedia.
A bit of background on this: Moldovan was the name given to the standard Romanian language written with Cyrillic alphabet in the Soviet Union.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the independent Republic of Moldova kept this name for the language, although it asserted to be the same language with Romanian and began to be written once again with Latin script.
More on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_language
As such, the "Moldovan language" got its own ISO code and a Wikipedia was created for it, although practically it's the same language as Romanian.
This Wikipedia remained empty with a redirect to Romanian Wikipedia on the main page, until User:Node_ue was made admin and began writing articles in Cyrillic alphabet.
About 95% of these articles were simply transliterations of articles from Romanian Wikipedia, a part of the transliterations being done manually by User:Russ, who can't speak Moldovan/Romanian and the resulting articles were rather wrong.
A few articles were actually written by User:Node_ue, but they were mostly stubs and rather badly written (with several grammatical mistakes per sentence).
The translation of the interface used a large number of obscure "pure Moldovan and not found in Romanian" words, which however, were not known to actual Moldovans. (examples include "bircieste" = "search" and "halaturi" = "tools")
The Voting -----------
During the period of 12 January - 12 February, a local voting has been organized to determine whether the community sees the need for the existence of a Moldovan Wikipedia.
The vote was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. While many of the side discussions were held in English and Russian (in addition to Moldovan/Romanian), the vote was restrained to determine the will of actual and potential editors. Some votes were rejected on this basis.
Romanian editors were accepted to vote for two reasons:
* 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no translation is necessary) from the Romanian wikipedia. In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
* Romanian and Moldovan are the same language for all day-to-day purposes (cf. [[:en:Moldovan language]]), which makes them potential editors.
Two votes were rejected because they were from people who did not speak Romanian/Moldovan and didn't had enough contributions to either wikipedia.
There are several strong reasons that compelled us to request the deletion of the Moldovan language Wikipedia. Among them technical, originality, and ethical arguments that we briefly expose here.
History ------- It was created by Node_ue, who was the first admin.
Its deletion has already been discussed. Consensus not reached, for the intentions of Node_ue, and the reaction of Moldovan editors was not clear at the time. At that time, it was already clear that a Latin-script Moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist (so that even Node_ue agreed to point the latin version to the Romanian wikipedia). It appeared that his only concern is to maintain the cyrillic version of the moldovan wikipedia, which uses the Sovied-imposed script.
Following several abusive administration incidents, the adminship has been removed from Node_ue.
==Deletion referendum==
Was held between between 12 January and 12 February and it was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. Romanian editors were accepted here for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no translation is necessary). In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are arguably the same language for all day-to-day purposes.
The result of the referendum is the following:
* No Moldovan editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
* No Romanian editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
* Only two editors have abstained, showing that the overwhelming majority of the users find the existence of the moldovan wikipedia offensive.
By Moldovan editor we understand here an editor that is able to contribute originally in the language.
Conclusion ------------
In conclusion, we, the Moldovan and Romanian wikipedia editors, believe that the current moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist for:
- it has no editor fluent in Moldovan
- it brings no information
- it is considered offensive by many Moldovans and Romanians.
Voting results --------------
The following people voted for the closing of the Wikipedia:
Moldova ---------- #[[User:Pavel|Pavel]] #[[User:Furculita|Furculita]] #[[User:AndersoN|AndersoN]] #[[User:Landroni|Landroni]] #[[User:Argos|Argos]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:TSO1D|TSO1D]]
Romania --------- #[[:ro:Utilizator:Out_slide|Out_slide]] #[[User:Bogdan|Bogdan]] #[[User:Romihaitza|Romihaitza]] #[[User:AdiJapan|AdiJapan]] #[[User:Dpotop]]/[[:ro:Utilizator:Dpotop]] #[[User:Ditae|Ditae]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Vlad|Vlad]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Orioane]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Leinarius]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Wars]] #[[Utilizator:Dacodava|Dacodava]] #[[User:Vasile|Vasile]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:MobyDick]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Arado]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Waelsch]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:olario]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Bunu vio]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:SCriBu]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Emily]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:R.S.]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Constantzeanu]] #[[User:Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?|Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?]] #[[User:Cosco|Cosco]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:AnaZ|AnaZ]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Dumiac|Dumiac]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Evosphere]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Laurap]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:KlaudiuMihaila]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Strainu]]
With these results, a clear consensus has been reached in the group of those who speak Romanian/Moldovan language.
Well...
This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks for it Bogdan !
A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more editable). Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
ant
Bogdan Giusca wrote:
The Moldovan Wikipedia community has decided to close down the Wikipedia.
A bit of background on this: Moldovan was the name given to the standard Romanian language written with Cyrillic alphabet in the Soviet Union.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the independent Republic of Moldova kept this name for the language, although it asserted to be the same language with Romanian and began to be written once again with Latin script.
More on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_language
As such, the "Moldovan language" got its own ISO code and a Wikipedia was created for it, although practically it's the same language as Romanian.
This Wikipedia remained empty with a redirect to Romanian Wikipedia on the main page, until User:Node_ue was made admin and began writing articles in Cyrillic alphabet.
About 95% of these articles were simply transliterations of articles from Romanian Wikipedia, a part of the transliterations being done manually by User:Russ, who can't speak Moldovan/Romanian and the resulting articles were rather wrong.
A few articles were actually written by User:Node_ue, but they were mostly stubs and rather badly written (with several grammatical mistakes per sentence).
The translation of the interface used a large number of obscure "pure Moldovan and not found in Romanian" words, which however, were not known to actual Moldovans. (examples include "bircieste" = "search" and "halaturi" = "tools")
The Voting
During the period of 12 January - 12 February, a local voting has been organized to determine whether the community sees the need for the existence of a Moldovan Wikipedia.
The vote was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. While many of the side discussions were held in English and Russian (in addition to Moldovan/Romanian), the vote was restrained to determine the will of actual and potential editors. Some votes were rejected on this basis.
Romanian editors were accepted to vote for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary) from the Romanian wikipedia. In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are the same language for all day-to-day
purposes (cf. [[:en:Moldovan language]]), which makes them potential editors.
Two votes were rejected because they were from people who did not speak Romanian/Moldovan and didn't had enough contributions to either wikipedia.
There are several strong reasons that compelled us to request the deletion of the Moldovan language Wikipedia. Among them technical, originality, and ethical arguments that we briefly expose here.
History
It was created by Node_ue, who was the first admin.
Its deletion has already been discussed. Consensus not reached, for the intentions of Node_ue, and the reaction of Moldovan editors was not clear at the time. At that time, it was already clear that a Latin-script Moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist (so that even Node_ue agreed to point the latin version to the Romanian wikipedia). It appeared that his only concern is to maintain the cyrillic version of the moldovan wikipedia, which uses the Sovied-imposed script.
Following several abusive administration incidents, the adminship has been removed from Node_ue.
==Deletion referendum==
Was held between between 12 January and 12 February and it was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. Romanian editors were accepted here for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary). In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are arguably the same language for all
day-to-day purposes.
The result of the referendum is the following:
No Moldovan editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
No Romanian editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
Only two editors have abstained, showing that the overwhelming
majority of the users find the existence of the moldovan wikipedia offensive.
By Moldovan editor we understand here an editor that is able to contribute originally in the language.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we, the Moldovan and Romanian wikipedia editors, believe that the current moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist for:
it has no editor fluent in Moldovan
it brings no information
it is considered offensive by many Moldovans and Romanians.
Voting results
The following people voted for the closing of the Wikipedia:
Moldova
#[[User:Pavel|Pavel]] #[[User:Furculita|Furculita]] #[[User:AndersoN|AndersoN]] #[[User:Landroni|Landroni]] #[[User:Argos|Argos]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:TSO1D|TSO1D]]
Romania
#[[:ro:Utilizator:Out_slide|Out_slide]] #[[User:Bogdan|Bogdan]] #[[User:Romihaitza|Romihaitza]] #[[User:AdiJapan|AdiJapan]] #[[User:Dpotop]]/[[:ro:Utilizator:Dpotop]] #[[User:Ditae|Ditae]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Vlad|Vlad]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Orioane]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Leinarius]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Wars]] #[[Utilizator:Dacodava|Dacodava]] #[[User:Vasile|Vasile]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:MobyDick]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Arado]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Waelsch]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:olario]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Bunu vio]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:SCriBu]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Emily]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:R.S.]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Constantzeanu]] #[[User:Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?|Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?]] #[[User:Cosco|Cosco]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:AnaZ|AnaZ]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Dumiac|Dumiac]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Evosphere]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Laurap]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:KlaudiuMihaila]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Strainu]]
With these results, a clear consensus has been reached in the group of those who speak Romanian/Moldovan language.
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Since the languages are virtually the same it's probably better for the mopedia to redir to the ropedia, so that Moldovan users can reach info in a language understood by them, instead of being restricted to the crappy Moldovan wp, perhaps without knowledge of the Romanian one.
From the summary above I see no reason to keep the mowiki in a locked
state.
/Andreas
On 3/6/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Andreas, did you visit the Moldovan Wikipedia? The frontpage actually says if you want to read content in Latin alphabet, go to the Romanian WP.
M
On 06/03/06, Andreas Vilén andreas.vilen@gmail.com wrote:
Since the languages are virtually the same it's probably better for the mopedia to redir to the ropedia, so that Moldovan users can reach info in a language understood by them, instead of being restricted to the crappy Moldovan wp, perhaps without knowledge of the Romanian one.
From the summary above I see no reason to keep the mowiki in a locked
state.
/Andreas
On 3/6/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin
Nope I didn't. But I don't see what good a separate language edition is if the difference is just the characters. In that case, it would be better to create a "romanian with cyrillic letters" pedia. As I've understood it, mowiki contains virtually nothing worth saving that isn't already at rowiki. Most moldavian people probably earn more knowledge from rowiki than mowiki anyway.
/Andreas
On 3/7/06, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas, did you visit the Moldovan Wikipedia? The frontpage actually says if you want to read content in Latin alphabet, go to the Romanian WP.
M
On 06/03/06, Andreas Vilén andreas.vilen@gmail.com wrote:
Since the languages are virtually the same it's probably better for the mopedia to redir to the ropedia, so that Moldovan users can reach info in a language understood by them, instead of being restricted to the crappy Moldovan wp, perhaps without knowledge of the Romanian one.
From the summary above I see no reason to keep the mowiki in a locked
state.
/Andreas
On 3/6/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
You don't seem to get it. There is Cyrillic content there that does not exist at rowiki. Why does it matter what it's called? Romanian with cyrillic letters, Moldovan, etc...
"As I understood it" demonstrates that you haven't actually investigated at all, which makes me wonder why you speak about the issue at all.
Mark
On 06/03/06, Andreas Vilén andreas.vilen@gmail.com wrote:
Nope I didn't. But I don't see what good a separate language edition is if the difference is just the characters. In that case, it would be better to create a "romanian with cyrillic letters" pedia. As I've understood it, mowiki contains virtually nothing worth saving that isn't already at rowiki. Most moldavian people probably earn more knowledge from rowiki than mowiki anyway.
/Andreas
On 3/7/06, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas, did you visit the Moldovan Wikipedia? The frontpage actually says if you want to read content in Latin alphabet, go to the Romanian WP.
M
On 06/03/06, Andreas Vilén andreas.vilen@gmail.com wrote:
Since the languages are virtually the same it's probably better for the mopedia to redir to the ropedia, so that Moldovan users can reach info in a language understood by them, instead of being restricted to the crappy Moldovan wp, perhaps without knowledge of the Romanian one.
From the summary above I see no reason to keep the mowiki in a locked
state.
/Andreas
On 3/6/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin
Current Moldovan Wikipedia content is not appropriate to the given domain, and thus it shouldn't be kept on mo.wiki. And I support the redirect to ro.wiki.
Furthermore, I believe that the results of the vote can be applied to the Moldovan Wiktionary. It is quite absurd from my point of view, considering that even in Moldova (and most probably in Transnistria) there is no such thing as Moldovan explanatory dictionaries (like the *Oxford Dictionary of English*) and especially no dictionaries translating Moldovan to other languages (*Moldovan - English* or* Italian - Moldovan*, for example). Well, there is one such work of art - *The Moldovan - Romanian *dictionary. Thus mo.wiktionary should as well become a redirect to ro.wiktionary.
On 06/03/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- Liviu
I have to object to this summary. There are a number of things about the vote which were unfair. Please see http://mo.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Node_ue/Rezultat_alegeri_-_%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0...
Note especially points 2, 3, 4, and 5.
It seems highly suspect to me that of all voters (the dozens and dozens of them), only 6 are actually "from Moldova", and even that cannot be confirmed.
I should note that I, for one, boycotted the vote; other votes were deleted unfairly.
Mark
On 05/03/06, Anthere Anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
Well...
This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks for it Bogdan !
A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more editable). Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
ant
Bogdan Giusca wrote:
The Moldovan Wikipedia community has decided to close down the Wikipedia.
A bit of background on this: Moldovan was the name given to the standard Romanian language written with Cyrillic alphabet in the Soviet Union.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the independent Republic of Moldova kept this name for the language, although it asserted to be the same language with Romanian and began to be written once again with Latin script.
More on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_language
As such, the "Moldovan language" got its own ISO code and a Wikipedia was created for it, although practically it's the same language as Romanian.
This Wikipedia remained empty with a redirect to Romanian Wikipedia on the main page, until User:Node_ue was made admin and began writing articles in Cyrillic alphabet.
About 95% of these articles were simply transliterations of articles from Romanian Wikipedia, a part of the transliterations being done manually by User:Russ, who can't speak Moldovan/Romanian and the resulting articles were rather wrong.
A few articles were actually written by User:Node_ue, but they were mostly stubs and rather badly written (with several grammatical mistakes per sentence).
The translation of the interface used a large number of obscure "pure Moldovan and not found in Romanian" words, which however, were not known to actual Moldovans. (examples include "bircieste" = "search" and "halaturi" = "tools")
The Voting
During the period of 12 January - 12 February, a local voting has been organized to determine whether the community sees the need for the existence of a Moldovan Wikipedia.
The vote was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. While many of the side discussions were held in English and Russian (in addition to Moldovan/Romanian), the vote was restrained to determine the will of actual and potential editors. Some votes were rejected on this basis.
Romanian editors were accepted to vote for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary) from the Romanian wikipedia. In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are the same language for all day-to-day
purposes (cf. [[:en:Moldovan language]]), which makes them potential editors.
Two votes were rejected because they were from people who did not speak Romanian/Moldovan and didn't had enough contributions to either wikipedia.
There are several strong reasons that compelled us to request the deletion of the Moldovan language Wikipedia. Among them technical, originality, and ethical arguments that we briefly expose here.
History
It was created by Node_ue, who was the first admin.
Its deletion has already been discussed. Consensus not reached, for the intentions of Node_ue, and the reaction of Moldovan editors was not clear at the time. At that time, it was already clear that a Latin-script Moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist (so that even Node_ue agreed to point the latin version to the Romanian wikipedia). It appeared that his only concern is to maintain the cyrillic version of the moldovan wikipedia, which uses the Sovied-imposed script.
Following several abusive administration incidents, the adminship has been removed from Node_ue.
==Deletion referendum==
Was held between between 12 January and 12 February and it was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. Romanian editors were accepted here for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary). In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are arguably the same language for all
day-to-day purposes.
The result of the referendum is the following:
No Moldovan editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
No Romanian editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
Only two editors have abstained, showing that the overwhelming
majority of the users find the existence of the moldovan wikipedia offensive.
By Moldovan editor we understand here an editor that is able to contribute originally in the language.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we, the Moldovan and Romanian wikipedia editors, believe that the current moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist for:
it has no editor fluent in Moldovan
it brings no information
it is considered offensive by many Moldovans and Romanians.
Voting results
The following people voted for the closing of the Wikipedia:
Moldova
#[[User:Pavel|Pavel]] #[[User:Furculita|Furculita]] #[[User:AndersoN|AndersoN]] #[[User:Landroni|Landroni]] #[[User:Argos|Argos]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:TSO1D|TSO1D]]
Romania
#[[:ro:Utilizator:Out_slide|Out_slide]] #[[User:Bogdan|Bogdan]] #[[User:Romihaitza|Romihaitza]] #[[User:AdiJapan|AdiJapan]] #[[User:Dpotop]]/[[:ro:Utilizator:Dpotop]] #[[User:Ditae|Ditae]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Vlad|Vlad]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Orioane]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Leinarius]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Wars]] #[[Utilizator:Dacodava|Dacodava]] #[[User:Vasile|Vasile]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:MobyDick]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Arado]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Waelsch]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:olario]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Bunu vio]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:SCriBu]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Emily]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:R.S.]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Constantzeanu]] #[[User:Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?|Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?]] #[[User:Cosco|Cosco]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:AnaZ|AnaZ]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Dumiac|Dumiac]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Evosphere]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Laurap]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:KlaudiuMihaila]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Strainu]]
With these results, a clear consensus has been reached in the group of those who speak Romanian/Moldovan language.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin
The Moldovan Wikipedia community has decided to close down the Wikipedia.
Bogdan's definition of "community" is very liberal here. 90% of these people showed up to vote, and made 0 edits other than that to the Moldovan WP. I would hardly consider them members of the "community".
A bit of background on this: Moldovan was the name given to the standard Romanian language written with Cyrillic alphabet in the Soviet Union.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the independent Republic of Moldova kept this name for the language, although it asserted to be the same language with Romanian and began to be written once again with Latin script.
What you _forgot_ to mention is that in Transnistria, Cyrillic is still official for the language. Thousands of schoolchildren each year go to school with textbooks in Cyrillic Moldovan.
This Wikipedia remained empty with a redirect to Romanian Wikipedia on the main page, until User:Node_ue was made admin and began writing articles in Cyrillic alphabet.
Actually, it happened exactly the other way around. I wrote hundreds of articles BEFORE I was made admin.
About 95% of these articles were simply transliterations of articles from Romanian Wikipedia, a part of the transliterations being done manually by User:Russ, who can't speak Moldovan/Romanian and the resulting articles were rather wrong.
How do you know whether or not Russ can speak Moldovan? How do you know the results are wrong? You can't write Cyrillic with good spelling, you're Romanian.
A few articles were a
ctually written by User:Node_ue, but they were
mostly stubs and rather badly written (with several grammatical mistakes per sentence).
Other users also contributed original articles. You can't really judge the quality of the articles unless you know which ones they were, which you don't.
The translation of the interface used a large number of obscure "pure Moldovan and not found in Romanian" words, which however, were not known to actual Moldovans. (examples include "bircieste" = "search" and "halaturi" = "tools")
Both words appear in Romanian dictionaries. (hint: "^i" is written "^a" in Romania)
During the period of 12 January - 12 February, a local voting has been organized to determine whether the community sees the need for the existence of a Moldovan Wikipedia.
You use the passive, and again you use the word "community" in an extremely liberal sense. There is much more to the story, which you choose to exclude because it reflects badly upon your cause.
The vote was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. While many of the side discussions were held in English and Russian (in addition to Moldovan/Romanian), the vote was restrained to determine the will of actual and potential editors. Some votes were rejected on this basis.
Rejected on this basis? On whose authority? And given what evidence?
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary) from the Romanian wikipedia. In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
This is an outright lie -- there was only one organiser of the referendum. I would not be surprised if he is just Bonaparte using a proxy, too.
- Romanian and Moldovan are the same language for all day-to-day
purposes (cf. [[:en:Moldovan language]]), which makes them potential editors.
Yes, well then, if they are potential editors, why can't they have registered and made edits already? If they're the same language, why can't they have contributions? In my opinion, just because they could potentially edit someday, doesn't mean they should be able to vote _today_.
Two votes were rejected because they were from people who did not speak Romanian/Moldovan and didn't had enough contributions to either wikipedia.
How do you know what they spoke?
There are several strong reasons that compelled us to request the deletion of the Moldovan language Wikipedia. Among them technical, originality, and ethical arguments that we briefly expose here.
...
History
It was created by Node_ue, who was the first admin.
That's an outright lie. It was "created" by a developer long before I even knew it existed.
Its deletion has already been discussed. Consensus not reached, for the intentions of Node_ue, and the reaction of Moldovan editors was not clear at the time. At that time, it was already clear that a Latin-script Moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist (so that even Node_ue agreed to point the latin version to the Romanian wikipedia). It appeared that his only concern is to maintain the cyrillic version of the moldovan wikipedia, which uses the Sovied-imposed script.
No, it was clear. The first vote on the future of that Wikipedia, votes were in favour of keeping it. And THAT time, not any Romanian guys were allowed to vote.
Following several abusive administration incidents, the adminship has been removed from Node_ue.
"Several abusive administration incidents" is another lie. There is more to it than Dpotop's description. My "abuses" were much more minor than yours -- you allowed numerous people to vandalise pages with not even a warning, and you used your powers to enforce your own POV. I simply blocked a user who was moving pages recklessly.
In conclusion, we, the Moldovan and Romanian wikipedia editors, believe that the current moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist for:
- it has no editor fluent in Moldovan
Another lie.
- it brings no information
Oh? How so? There are hundreds of informative pages, in both Cyrillic and Latin.
- it is considered offensive by many Moldovans and Romanians.
Well, the Kurdish Wikipedia offends many Turks, but it still exists.
With these results, a clear consensus has been reached in the group of those who speak Romanian/Moldovan language.
Hah.
Mark
Also, I noticed a few hotbutton names among the list of voters.
Bonaparte, first of all, was banned permanently from the English Wikipedia for, among other things, malicious sockpuppetry.
Dacodava, second of all, was banned permanently from the English Wikipedia for making death threats.
And here they are, counted as members of the supposed "Moldovan Wikipedia community".
Really, both of them have spread such vitriolic unionistic rhetoric that it's absurd to consider them part of the Moldovan _anything_!
Mark
On 05/03/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
The Moldovan Wikipedia community has decided to close down the Wikipedia.
A bit of background on this: Moldovan was the name given to the standard Romanian language written with Cyrillic alphabet in the Soviet Union.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the independent Republic of Moldova kept this name for the language, although it asserted to be the same language with Romanian and began to be written once again with Latin script.
More on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_language
As such, the "Moldovan language" got its own ISO code and a Wikipedia was created for it, although practically it's the same language as Romanian.
This Wikipedia remained empty with a redirect to Romanian Wikipedia on the main page, until User:Node_ue was made admin and began writing articles in Cyrillic alphabet.
About 95% of these articles were simply transliterations of articles from Romanian Wikipedia, a part of the transliterations being done manually by User:Russ, who can't speak Moldovan/Romanian and the resulting articles were rather wrong.
A few articles were actually written by User:Node_ue, but they were mostly stubs and rather badly written (with several grammatical mistakes per sentence).
The translation of the interface used a large number of obscure "pure Moldovan and not found in Romanian" words, which however, were not known to actual Moldovans. (examples include "bircieste" = "search" and "halaturi" = "tools")
The Voting
During the period of 12 January - 12 February, a local voting has been organized to determine whether the community sees the need for the existence of a Moldovan Wikipedia.
The vote was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. While many of the side discussions were held in English and Russian (in addition to Moldovan/Romanian), the vote was restrained to determine the will of actual and potential editors. Some votes were rejected on this basis.
Romanian editors were accepted to vote for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary) from the Romanian wikipedia. In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are the same language for all day-to-day
purposes (cf. [[:en:Moldovan language]]), which makes them potential editors.
Two votes were rejected because they were from people who did not speak Romanian/Moldovan and didn't had enough contributions to either wikipedia.
There are several strong reasons that compelled us to request the deletion of the Moldovan language Wikipedia. Among them technical, originality, and ethical arguments that we briefly expose here.
History
It was created by Node_ue, who was the first admin.
Its deletion has already been discussed. Consensus not reached, for the intentions of Node_ue, and the reaction of Moldovan editors was not clear at the time. At that time, it was already clear that a Latin-script Moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist (so that even Node_ue agreed to point the latin version to the Romanian wikipedia). It appeared that his only concern is to maintain the cyrillic version of the moldovan wikipedia, which uses the Sovied-imposed script.
Following several abusive administration incidents, the adminship has been removed from Node_ue.
==Deletion referendum==
Was held between between 12 January and 12 February and it was opened to confirmed (>25 edits) Moldovan and Romanian editors. Romanian editors were accepted here for two reasons:
- 95% of the content was simply copied here and transliterated (no
translation is necessary). In the oppinion of the moldovan organizers of the referendum, this gives Romanians a right to express their vote.
- Romanian and Moldovan are arguably the same language for all
day-to-day purposes.
The result of the referendum is the following:
No Moldovan editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
No Romanian editor supports the existence of this wikipedia.
Only two editors have abstained, showing that the overwhelming
majority of the users find the existence of the moldovan wikipedia offensive.
By Moldovan editor we understand here an editor that is able to contribute originally in the language.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we, the Moldovan and Romanian wikipedia editors, believe that the current moldovan wikipedia has no reason to exist for:
it has no editor fluent in Moldovan
it brings no information
it is considered offensive by many Moldovans and Romanians.
Voting results
The following people voted for the closing of the Wikipedia:
Moldova
#[[User:Pavel|Pavel]] #[[User:Furculita|Furculita]] #[[User:AndersoN|AndersoN]] #[[User:Landroni|Landroni]] #[[User:Argos|Argos]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:TSO1D|TSO1D]]
Romania
#[[:ro:Utilizator:Out_slide|Out_slide]] #[[User:Bogdan|Bogdan]] #[[User:Romihaitza|Romihaitza]] #[[User:AdiJapan|AdiJapan]] #[[User:Dpotop]]/[[:ro:Utilizator:Dpotop]] #[[User:Ditae|Ditae]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Vlad|Vlad]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Orioane]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Leinarius]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Wars]] #[[Utilizator:Dacodava|Dacodava]] #[[User:Vasile|Vasile]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:MobyDick]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Arado]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Waelsch]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:olario]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Bunu vio]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:SCriBu]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Emily]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:R.S.]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Constantzeanu]] #[[User:Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?|Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?]] #[[User:Cosco|Cosco]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:AnaZ|AnaZ]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Dumiac|Dumiac]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Evosphere]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Laurap]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:KlaudiuMihaila]] #[[:ro:Utilizator:Strainu]]
With these results, a clear consensus has been reached in the group of those who speak Romanian/Moldovan language.
http://mo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Alegeri
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org