>>>> "DM" == Daniel Mayer
<maveric149(a)yahoo.com> writes:
DM> We may be able to argue that it is since we explicitly give
DM> people the option of providing a link-back in lieu of the more
DM> strict author requirement of the GNU FDL. Given our liberal
DM> interpretation of the GNU FDL I don't think that a mention of
DM> our project's name is much to ask (even if it is just a
DM> request, and not a mandate). As I said before this may even go
DM> beyond the GNU FDL and get into proper referencing practices.
So, isn't the whole point of Wikipedia to create and distribute free
information? I mean, yes, downstream publishers should -- no, *must*
-- comply with the GFDL, but besides that, shouldn't we be _happy_
that someone's redistributing the encyclopedia?
We need to make it _easier_ for people to re-publish the encyclopedia
in a way that complies with the GFDL -- not punish them for doing so.
That said, it's probably a good idea to ask for links back to
xx.wikipedia.org. Not to promote the site (hell, it's plenty popular),
but to make it easier for readers to contribute and fix errors in
articles.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <evan(a)wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel -
http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide