is it just me or has anyone else noticed the sheer amount of lists that we have? running a title search for the word 'list' will come up with such bizarre pages as [[List of places and things named Oxford]].
I know list can be usefull but isn't this going a bit too far? (especially that we've got a decent search function now). Shouldn't the lists be simply attached to the main article without creating a new page for each and every on of them?
regards, [[list of people and things named WojPob]]
It depends on the size of the list. Small and relevant lists, such as the works of an author, could be kept on the article page. Huges lists should be spun off onto their own page, and annotated.
Stephen G.
--- wojtek pobratyn wojtek.pobratyn@gmx.net wrote:
is it just me or has anyone else noticed the sheer amount of lists that we have? running a title search for the word 'list' will come up with such bizarre pages as [[List of places and things named Oxford]].
I know list can be usefull but isn't this going a bit too far? (especially that we've got a decent search function now). Shouldn't the lists be simply attached to the main article without creating a new page for each and every on of
them?
regards, [[list of people and things named WojPob]]
[Wikipedia-l] To manage your subscription to this list, please go here: http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org