Dear Admins
I had a SysOp status until 03.abr.2004 at http://pt.wikipedia.org but today my status was changed.
Two administrators of Portugal had been discuss with me about differences between the language said in Brazil and Portugal. They are creating rules without consulting the community and had said that they would go to take off my status of administrator because this divergences.
He would like to know which was the reason of the SysOp change and if an administrator of Brazil in Wikipedia PT/BR would be possible. The actual administrators is creating a dictatorship.
Tnks. sorry about my english
Paulo Ricardo Colacino user: PauloColacino Rio de Janeiro - Brasil
"Paulo Ricardo Colacino" colacino@terra.com.br wrote in message news:00b301c41a09$7b82bd10$7cd2fea9@COLACINO...
Dear Admins
I had a SysOp status until 03.abr.2004 at http://pt.wikipedia.org but
today my
status was changed.
Two administrators of Portugal had been discuss with me about differences between the language said in Brazil and Portugal. They are creating rules without consulting the community and had said that they would go to take
off
my status of administrator because this divergences.
He would like to know which was the reason of the SysOp change and if an administrator of Brazil in Wikipedia PT/BR would be possible. The actual administrators is creating a dictatorship.
Tnks. sorry about my english
I desysopped Paulo after consultation with two active users on pt: JorgeGG and Joao Miranda. Jorge came to me on IRC saying that he had given Paulo administrator access recently, but that he was mistaken and he wanted to reverse this error. Paulo was ignoring the existing policies of the wiki, and refused to listen to the other administrators when confronted. Armed with my trusty machine translator, I checked out the debate, and found that Joao Miranda had also attempted to set Paulo straight on wiki policy. I asked Joao if he agreed with JorgeGG on desysopping. He said (on my user talk page):
"I don't know. It has been difficult to make PauloColacino follow the rules established by the community. We had some problems with him because of some page deletions and copyright violations. But I don't like the idea of removing his access to administrative powers because that could make him radicalise his positions. I'm in favour of removing his administrative access if he abuses his administrative powers again. pt:Usuário:JoaoMiranda "
Two days later, JorgeGG contacted me again, saying that Paulo's behaviour had worsened. He said that he was sure Joao would now change his mind, and that he was happy to wait until that happened before I performed the desysopping. Sure enough, within hours I received this from Joao:
"It's me again. I lost any hope that PauloColacino will ever change his attitude. Today he is using every pretext he can find to start conflicts with me and pt:Usuário:Jorge and abused his powers by blocking some pages (he thinks he can block pages from other administrators). So I have to ask you to remove administrator access from PauloColacino. pt:Usuário:JoaoMiranda "
In response, I desysopped Paulo.
I didn't hold a vote for two reasons. Firstly, it's a small wiki with only a few active users. Secondly, I sympathised with JorgeGG's desire to be able to correct his own mistakes. A sysop should have the trust of the large majority of the community. I was confident that if these two active users felt that Paulo shouldn't be a sysop -- indeed, the only two users who had commented on Paulo's behaviour -- then he shouldn't be a sysop.
-- Tim Starling
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org