Hello all,
The popularity counter starts from 0 after the move. Is this the right thing to do ?
What do you think ?
Regards, kpj.
"Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz" wrote:
Hello all,
The popularity counter starts from 0 after the move. Is this the right thing to do ?
What do you think ?
i think it should be reset on the first of every month to give a more useful and interesting set of figures. Otherwise it just shows that 'sex' and sex-related topics are the most popular... it's more interesting to see that in February, people wanted to find out about St Francis and the history of Zimbabwe.
Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
"Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz" wrote:
The popularity counter starts from 0 after the move. Is this the right thing to do ?
i think it should be reset on the first of every month to give a more useful and interesting set of figures. Otherwise it just shows that 'sex' and sex-related topics are the most popular... it's more interesting to see that in February, people wanted to find out about St Francis and the history of Zimbabwe.
I don't think that resetting at the beginning of each month would work either. That would cause erratic lists in the early part of each month. More interesting would be the most popular in a floating period of the last 30 or 60 days. A result that shows a several of these amounts could also be interesting. Eclecticology
Last night I shut down for the night at about 1 am, and was back into Wikipedia about 12 hours later at 1 pm. Naturally, the first place visited on line was "Recent changes", where I had to crank it up to 1000 items before I could pick up my shut-down time. That's ok, and it doesn't bother me to see that someone else had saved their article several times before being satisfied with his or her own work. (In fact it made me feel good to see that I was not the only one who had to do this.)
Once I've picked up my prior shut-down time I begin to go through the articles more or less chronologically reading changes that I might find interesting. When I've finished reading a change, and sometimes made related corrections or contributions, I back button to the recent changes list to look for the next interesting article.
Before the current update back button would bring me back to my cached list at the place on the list where I left off. When I reached the top of the list I could use reload to get the most recent of the most recent.
With the updated system I find that the back button now forces a reload of the most recent changes, and puts me at the top of the revised list. I then have to scroll through the list to find where I left off. I really would like to at least have the option of back-buttoning to my cached page.
Since the circulated test results show that Recent Changes with a large parameter of articles continue to be one of the slow response request, the last thing the system needs is a number of forced reloads of Recent Changes. My 1000 articles was based on only 12 hours. At that rate 3 days would require a 5000 article request for recent changes.
Eclecticology
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org