This is indeed a real problem. We generally accept that we should give "due weight" to topics - relatively obscure theories, don't get treated at the same length as their more widely supported brethren, which is fair and even the fringe theorists mostly accept it
In comparative articles, absolutely. But NPOV "Undue weight" tells us: "Minority views can receive attention on pages specifically devoted to them"
Though it use to read: "None of this is to say that tiny-minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can give them on pages specifically devoted to them."
Regards,
Ian Tresman www.plasma-universe.com
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org