Well, since nobody else seems interested in vandalism, I guess I won't bother to try to revert any that happen in the future.
Zoe
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 09:29:10PM -0800, Zoe wrote:
Well, since nobody else seems interested in vandalism, I guess I won't bother to try to revert any that happen in the future.
It's Christmas. We're tired, and hung over, and snuggling up for a warm winters sleep with our hoochie coochies. Get back to us when the holiday is over, the sun has returned, and the new year has begun :-)
Jonathan
I'm concerned about it. I would support that the ip numbers in question be banned, at least through the holidays until we are back in full strength. It's a pain that these are AOL proxies, and so we should try to unban them as soon as we can, but the cost to us of having this headache is much higher than the cost of losing a few edits from a few AOLers.
Zoe wrote:
Well, since nobody else seems interested in vandalism, I guess I won't bother to try to revert any that happen in the future.
Zoe
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
I have an idea for a shortcut for interlinks -- could an interlink with no article name be taken to mean "the same title as this page"?
eg: On the french page "Milan Kundera", a link that's just "[[en:]] would mean "the equivalent english language page has the same name, ie it is [[en:Milan Kundera]].
(... or is this one of those cool things the dev team have already thought of but not told us mortals? ;-)
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org