I think what we decided before was that since disk space is cheap, we could feel free to
write about anything that merits an article (that's of course subject to opinion).
I wouldn't question anyone else's article unless it had no google results, or
almost none. I remember one of 24's contributions turned up only four domains that
mentioned it, and I questioned that as an attempt to coin a term rather than describe
existing topics.
kq
It is a
question that strikes at the very heart of the Wikipedia project... who
decides what deserves to be here and what doesn't? The article in question does
not contravene any of the Wikipedia rules, it does not advertise, it's not
offensive... it's just boring and trivial, and probably of no interest to
anyone except his close friends.
[snip]
Hmmm... IMO, if you can write at least three interesting paragraphs
containing valid information on a subject/person/thing, then it deserves
to be there. To take Star Wars as an example, I don't think we need a
page for say characters who said two lines in Attack of the Clones, or
for the actors who played them. There just isn't enough to say about
them. But if there's a character who says 2 lines in AOTC and pops up
again in the next one whatever it's called and was also in the first
one, well then there's something to say about them.
I guess it's a matter of personal taste more than anything else.
--
Karen AKA Kajikit
You can take the dragon out of Alfandra, but you can never take Alfandra
out of the dragon (or the Kitty)...
Come and visit my part of the web:
Kajikit's Corner:
http://Kajikit.netfirms.com/
Aussie Support Mailing List:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AussieSupport
Allergyfree Eating Recipe Swap:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Allergyfree_Eating
Love and huggles to all!
[Wikipedia-l]
To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
0