On Monday 11 November 2002 02:39 pm, Zoe wrote:
Who locked the database, why, and when will it be unlocked? If solving the lag problem is to make it impossible to update, what' s the point of having a wikipedia? Zoe
Yes, an uneditable wiki is a major joke. Our articles are always readable via Google cache. Could it be possible to allow editing by at least logged-in users?
--Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
PS I hope the reason why there have been so damn many posts today is just because nobody can edit. I don't have time to read 5+ digests a day.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Daniel Mayer wrote:
On Monday 11 November 2002 02:39 pm, Zoe wrote:
Who locked the database, why, and when will it be unlocked? If solving the lag problem is to make it impossible to update, what' s the point of having a wikipedia? Zoe
Yes, an uneditable wiki is a major joke. Our articles are always readable via Google cache. Could it be possible to allow editing by at least logged-in users?
Okay, mav, YOU try to keep the the damn site up while everybody complains at you. I look forward to your solution, which I expect to be ready and running immediately.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org