It seems to me like the answers to all your questions lie within https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOV ======================================== ~ Ben / Salvidrim<https://salvidrim.net/>t/>! · English Wikipedia Administrator & SPI Clerk · <https://ca.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page> Wikimedia Canada< https://ca.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page> member · <https://utrs.wmflabs.org/team.php#tamb> UTRS Ambassador< https://utrs.wmflabs.org/team.php#tamb> ________________________________ From: Wikipedia-l &lt;wikipedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Frederick FN Noronha फ्रेड्रिक नोरोन्या *فريدريك نورونيا < fredericknoronha(a)gmail.com&gt; Sent: April 19, 2017 10:35 PM To: Wikipedia mailing list Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Query about changes on the Wikipedia Dear Wikipedians: Recently, there was an election in Goa, India. The party which lost ascended power, because some of the smaller parties that won a few seats each (and Independents too) changed their earlier stance and decided decided to support the former. This lead to debate and criticism here. Please visit the page on the Goa Forward Part [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goa_Forward_Party], a local political party, a page which I initially helped build. Somewhere along the way, following a few anonymous and signed edits, the page has got changed rather drastically. See the changes between: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goa_Forward_Party&type=revis… The content and context has been changed rather drastically, and in my view some parts of the new page reads like official PR sheet of the party itself. A few important critical sections have been completely deleted, while an unsigned comment on the Talk page argues that the article is being "edited to make it more up-to-date" and some sections "appear too elaborate and unnecessary". My questions are: * How does Wikipedia check edits which might change an entry drastically while claiming to improve it, specially in a context where there might be only few Wikipedia volunteer editors working in a particular region? * In case politicians get assistance -- paid or otherwise -- to do some window-dressing of their entries, how is this to be tackled? * Given that regions like India have a lot of techie skills (but only few volunteers), and the social media is being widely (mis)used to fight political sides, does the Wikipedia have any best practices to understand how such issues could be coped with? Thanks and regards, Fredericknoronha -- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ Frederick Noronha http://about.me/noronhafrederick http://goa1556.in _/ P +91-832-2409490 <+91%20832%20240%209490> M 9822122436 Twitter @fn Fcbk:fredericknoronha _/ Hear Goa,1556 shared audio content at https://archive.org/details/goa1556 _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l