Tom Parmenter wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
>tarquin wrote:
>>If we change all "it's" to either
"its" or the more formal "it is", then
>>that list will gradually diminish.
>So we're at the point now where it's been
suggested
>to remove a word ("it's") entirely from Wikipedia
>because it's difficult to tell when it's misspelled?
>This is far more zealous than we need to be.
>Correct them when you find them, but don't go overboard --
>they're just mispeelings!
I guess I'll need to explain this.
There is no need to explain anything.
I'm perfectly aware of everything that you say below
(except for the claim that there is no misspelling, which is quite false).
I stand by my comment.
There are two words with the letter sequence I T S.
One is the contraction of "it is" and is
marked by an apostrophe ('),
between the T and the S.
The other is a possessive pronoun and has no
apostrophe.
Since many forms of the possessive end with an
apostrophe and an S,
some people write "it's" for the possessive form when they should have
written "its". Likewise, although more rarely, some people write
"its" when they should have written "it's".
There is no "mispelling" involved in this
error and there is no way in
hell any computer program in SQL can tell the difference between these
two frequently confused forms and correct the error.
-- Toby