Gerard.
It is very much like you to attack someone for a short comment with little meaning attached.
I said:
Because they speak Afrikaans, and would be able to give the view of a native speaker.
And you told me that I may know a lot about languages, but nothing about Wiktionary. That response is uncalled-for. It is insulting, untrue, and on top of that a slap in the face after my having just begun to monitor inactive Wiktionaries a week or so ago.
You do not speak Afrikaans (this, not "African", is the English name as well). Different languages may have peculiar capitalisation rules, which require headwords to be capitalised.
The simple input of a native speaker is not difficult to obtain, and we would do well to get it. We can ask them, "in Afrikaans dictionaries, are headwords capitalised?". And they will answer us. Very easy.
But you choose instead to make blanket assumptions about all languages, and to tell me what I do and don't know.
My brain is my own, and only I know which things I do and don't know. I do not plan on giving you my brain anytime soon, either, thank you very much.
Good day to you, sir.
Mark
On 15/07/05, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Mark, You may now something about languages, but you have no clue about Wiktionary. And if you did, I would welcome your comments about the ERD that I posted here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:ERD.jpg It is a work in progress and it is working towards the Ultimate Wiktionary. I can put dialects in there but I am not yet happy about this aspect as I cannot truly enter simplified Chinese in there in a proper way. It also places etymology on a different place from where it is traditionally placed in the wiktionaries due to the fact that there are some that differ depending on the meaning of a word.
As to capitalisation; any paper dictionary does not capitalise the words that are in there unless they are capitalised as a rule. It is due to some unfortunate history that it took so long to change the English wiktionary. There are currently 19 articles in the African wiktionary, Jcwf may want to use the same system of templates that are used in many of the other wiktionaries. To do this it helps to have capitalisation turned off.
I second his request to turn capitalisation on the af.wiktionary off.
Thanks, GerardM
Mark Williamson wrote:
Mark
On 15/07/05, Timwi timwi@gmx.net wrote:
Angela wrote:
Ashar's request was to ask af.wikipedia, not Wiktionary about this, and they have 4000 articles and a reasonably active, though small, community.
If none of them participates in Wiktionary, why does their opinion count any more than anyone else's?
Sorry. Wrong list.
Mark
On 15/07/05, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard.
It is very much like you to attack someone for a short comment with little meaning attached.
I said:
Because they speak Afrikaans, and would be able to give the view of a native speaker.
And you told me that I may know a lot about languages, but nothing about Wiktionary. That response is uncalled-for. It is insulting, untrue, and on top of that a slap in the face after my having just begun to monitor inactive Wiktionaries a week or so ago.
You do not speak Afrikaans (this, not "African", is the English name as well). Different languages may have peculiar capitalisation rules, which require headwords to be capitalised.
The simple input of a native speaker is not difficult to obtain, and we would do well to get it. We can ask them, "in Afrikaans dictionaries, are headwords capitalised?". And they will answer us. Very easy.
But you choose instead to make blanket assumptions about all languages, and to tell me what I do and don't know.
My brain is my own, and only I know which things I do and don't know. I do not plan on giving you my brain anytime soon, either, thank you very much.
Good day to you, sir.
Mark
On 15/07/05, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Mark, You may now something about languages, but you have no clue about Wiktionary. And if you did, I would welcome your comments about the ERD that I posted here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:ERD.jpg It is a work in progress and it is working towards the Ultimate Wiktionary. I can put dialects in there but I am not yet happy about this aspect as I cannot truly enter simplified Chinese in there in a proper way. It also places etymology on a different place from where it is traditionally placed in the wiktionaries due to the fact that there are some that differ depending on the meaning of a word.
As to capitalisation; any paper dictionary does not capitalise the words that are in there unless they are capitalised as a rule. It is due to some unfortunate history that it took so long to change the English wiktionary. There are currently 19 articles in the African wiktionary, Jcwf may want to use the same system of templates that are used in many of the other wiktionaries. To do this it helps to have capitalisation turned off.
I second his request to turn capitalisation on the af.wiktionary off.
Thanks, GerardM
Mark Williamson wrote:
Mark
On 15/07/05, Timwi timwi@gmx.net wrote:
Angela wrote:
Ashar's request was to ask af.wikipedia, not Wiktionary about this, and they have 4000 articles and a reasonably active, though small, community.
If none of them participates in Wiktionary, why does their opinion count any more than anyone else's?
-- SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM POSSIT MATERIARI ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org