--- Lars Aronsson lars@aronsson.se wrote:

I think that level is fine for Wikipedia. A geology project would have to go into much more detail, and structure the facts in a more systematic way.

I also plan to create Wikipedia articles on each formation once I find a good source for that. At that point, there really isn't much more to say so I don't know what a Wikigeology project would cover that could not be naturally covered in Wikipedia.

Although a spatial database showing the extent, thickness, and composition of each formation at every studied point and the relationships between formations would be most useful....

It would be fine, however, to doubt the usefulness of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AF107

Well that's a stub so of course there could be doubts about its usefulness.

-- mav

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com